The Trump Presidency

Do you think trump would be as aggressive in his tweets and such if the media didn't attack him and spread lies about him everyday. EVERYFREAKINGDAY

Lol

What's the saying again: "He that lieth down with dogs shall rise up with fleas"

The orange one is a lair, he deserves it all coming at him

Him calling someone a liar should be the picture of the pot calling the kettle black when you look that up
 
sweet, a new day, yet again him just doing something utterly stupid

the orange one reversing the Cuba policy is narrow minded to say the least

it hurts regular Cubans who were getting money in their pocket and gives the Cuban gov't the same excuse now to point their finger at America and blame us.

****ing infuriating

edit: will happen later today (friday)
 
sweet, a new day, yet again him just doing something utterly stupid

the orange one reversing the Cuba policy is narrow minded to say the least

it hurts regular Cubans who were getting money in their pocket and gives the Cuban gov't the same excuse now to point their finger at America and blame us.

****ing infuriating

edit: will happen later today (friday)

He just wants to exercise his power in some way. Much like the Paris fiasco. He must feed his base if they are going to stand by him through the Russian/obstruction/emoluments/etc. scandals. They won't. Down to 36%, aka the flat earthers.
 
Do you think trump would be as aggressive in his tweets and such if the media didn't attack him and spread lies about him everyday. EVERYFREAKINGDAY

YES. He was aggressive in his tweets even before he became a candidate and he thinks his tweets are what his supporters like.

He hasn't learned that campaigning and governing require different tweeting strategies.
 
Mueller Is Coming for Trump
" The special counsel’s expanding probe will reveal loads of dirt from the president’s financial past—making the temptation to fire him even greater.

And what, exactly, will Mueller find now that he has substantially broadened the scope of his investigation? It’s impossible to say, but easy to speculate. Reporters have already uncovered an astonishing amount of disturbing information about Trump. There’s the Azerbaijan hotel project propped up by graft and bribery with ties to Iran’s Revolutionary Guard. The charitable foundation accused of self-dealing and tax fraud. The questionable Deutsche Bank loans with ties to Moscow. The close association with allegedly criminal international companies. The journalists chasing these leads have hit snags, obstacles, and insurmountable walls, leading to stories that suggest the possibility of law-breaking but end with lingering uncertainty. Mueller need not put up with such stonewalling. He has the tools to dig much deeper.

That is the dilemma that Trump faces: Answer for his old crimes, or commit a new one. Neither option will allow him to get to the business of governing; both pave the way to impeachment if the GOP grows frustrated by the lack of legislative progress. Mueller’s deepening dragnet has greatly increased the likelihood the president will face real consequences for his actions. We don’t yet know what those consequences look like. But they seem to be fast approaching. "
 
So it's trumps fault that a mentally insane man opened fire on republicans?

Was it Obamas fault that an insane man opened fire on a democratic congresswoman in Arizona?

The act itself does not make him insane. I don't think someone can be violently insane and get to that age before committing a serious act of violence like this. One of the most dangerous things is a person who thinks they are right.
 
And the Democrats have been saying that the right is trying to kill you with healthcare, steal yout money to give to the rich and are racist. Where is all this popular culture vilifying everything on the left?

There are a number of cases where that is the fact
https://www.axios.com/who-loses-fro...utm_medium=twsocialshare&utm_campaign=organic

The bottom line: As many as 27 million Americans could face annual limits on their coverage, and 20 million could be hit with lifetime limits, according to the analysis.
................................

Do you understand the implications of lifetime limits ?
And, who it effects ?

So yes, it is a verifiable fact that " the right is trying to kill you with healthcare "

and with the money saved

"steal yout money to give to the rich"

Where is all this popular culture vilifying everything on the left?
Whatever that has to do with anything
...

Matthew Yglesias‏Verified account @mattyglesias 17m17 minutes ago

Matthew Yglesias Retweeted Topher Spiro

Lifetime limits mean insurance is useless to the people who need it most
 
[tw]875701471999864833[/tw]

Does Trump actually forget the **** he tells everyone or does he just assume the public will?

But this is totally him taking step one in firing Rosenstein in order to fire Mueller with a new DAG, right?
 
[tw]875701471999864833[/tw]

Does Trump actually forget the **** he tells everyone or does he just assume the public will?

But this is totally him taking step one in firing Rosenstein in order to fire Mueller with a new DAG, right?

"I was already gonna fire him," he said several times.

His squandering has become so pathetic the 'bleeding heart liberal' in me is actually starting to feel sorry for him. What happened to the good, smart people he was going to hire to keep him from making a complete fool of himself?
 
That signature is indeed scary.

just11111.jpg
 
Think for a minute had Trump taken Obama's advise and not hired Michael Flynn

I am reminded of John Gotti
and this

hu·bris
ˈ(h)yo͞obrəs/
noun
noun: hubris

excessive pride or self-confidence.
synonyms: arrogance, conceit, haughtiness, hauteur, pride, self-importance, egotism, pomposity, superciliousness, superiority; More
informalbig-headedness, cockiness
"the hubris among economists was shaken"
antonyms: humility
(in Greek tragedy) excessive pride toward or defiance of the gods, leading to nemesis.
 
Feinstein sent a letter to GOP chair Chuck Grassley requesting that both Comey and Sessions be invited to testify before the committee. Grassley announced Wednesday, to the consternation of some GOP colleagues, that the committee would investigate whether there was any "improper interference" with FBI investigations during the election or otherwise.

This is a BFD.
Couple this with the vote this week on Russian Sanctions and we are watching the walls start to crumble

http://www.dailykos.com/stories/201...-on-the-Hill-supports-a-subpoena-if-necessary
 
Back
Top