The War to Settle the Score - Election Day 2024

Tapate50 said:
She said she'd do the same, how would a fair percent not vote for a Biden Clone?
Click to expand...

The assumption would be that many 2020 Biden voters wouldn’t have voted for Biden in 2024 (Trump flips, stayed home, protest voted, etc.). I think this assumption is backed up by the horrendous polling of Biden prior to dropping out.
 
thethe said:
Impossible to say but I'd give a range of 1-3M. Still doesn't account for the following:

1) Increase in voting population

2) No way to gauge in states like California where its hte wild west how much rampant cheating still existed in both years

3) How many low prop never before voters Trump turned out this year
Click to expand...

1) Population increased 4m since 2020 including people not eligible to vote (immigrants, 1m children, etc). If you assume ~66% voter turnout (2020), then that gets you around 1-1.5m increase voter population. Even a 1 point drop in voter turnout erases that. I think that’s entirely plausible that people were less motivated to vote this year vs 2020 when we were literally caged animals for 9 months.

2) I haven’t looked at California. Would be interesting to analyze post count (btw - insane they are still counting)

3) I’m sure it’s decent for sure, otherwise, he wouldn’t have flipped the popular vote. But I wouldn’t be surprised if it was less than the Biden voter who couldn’t be bothered to show up.
 
sturg33 said:
Nsacpi/57/runnin... what are yall sending them??

[Tw]1855817928957948204[/tw]
Click to expand...

Whats the issue here? This time last Presidential election Trump was asking Republicans to donate to overturn the results of the election knowing full well he had no path to victory and used that money to pay off campaign debt.
 
cajunrevenge said:
Whats the issue here? This time last Presidential election Trump was asking Republicans to donate to overturn the results of the election knowing full well he had no path to victory and used that money to pay off campaign debt.
Click to expand...

ALso it's for runoffs and funding campaigns who're still counting.
 
[tw]1856335468692156708[/tw]

What a sucker you have ot be to vote D or give money to D's.

Majority of this money is laundered through ActBlue anyway but they just outright robbed their voters.
 
[tw]1856307395342798920[/tw]

Full audits everywhere - It was actually a bigger landslide than what is being reported now.

Fraud didn't just stop.
 
thethe said:
[tw]1856335468692156708[/tw]

What a sucker you have ot be to vote D or give money to D's.

Majority of this money is laundered through ActBlue anyway but they just outright robbed their voters.
Click to expand...

There's no way that story is true. Beyonce is married to a billionaire, she wouldn't take 10M to endorse a candidate (mind you Beyonce has endorsed Biden before) because what good would that do? Especially considering there would be political backlash.

Why would Megan Thee Stallion be a huge draw for the DNC? Taylor Swift you'd have a point. But Meg would only be good at moving a portion of the base who already is a blue block. That being fair I can understand your jealousy, DNC gets babes like BEyonce, Taylor, Meg, etc. in their corner while you get those hotties Roseanne and Caitlyn Jenner.
 
zitothebrave said:
There's no way that story is true. Beyonce is married to a billionaire, she wouldn't take 10M to endorse a candidate (mind you Beyonce has endorsed Biden before) because what good would that do? Especially considering there would be political backlash.

Why would Megan Thee Stallion be a huge draw for the DNC? Taylor Swift you'd have a point. But Meg would only be good at moving a portion of the base who already is a blue block. That being fair I can understand your jealousy, DNC gets babes like BEyonce, Taylor, Meg, etc. in their corner while you get those hotties Roseanne and Caitlyn Jenner.
Click to expand...

What in the history of politics from either side makes you believe this story isn't likely? The Dems just blew through 1 billion dollars in 4 months and finished 20 million in debt. They clearly weren't afraid to spend money. And if there's anything we know about celebrities, they rarely do anything for free. And they certainly aren't shy about taking money either.
 
Carp said:
What in the history of politics from either side makes you believe this story isn't likely? The Dems just blew through 1 billion dollars in 4 months and finished 20 million in debt. They clearly weren't afraid to spend money. And if there's anything we know about celebrities, they rarely do anything for free. And they certainly aren't shy about taking money either.
Click to expand...

I'm not going to fully get into this argument if the intent is to split hairs on costs to put on a performance. Because if that's the kind of waste people want to talk about we can probably find out how much money republicans put into events on trump's property.

They didn't pay for endorsements, it's a stupid strategy and as I said paying someone who's biggest base is young minority women doesn't seem like the smartest use of money, it would have been smarter to pay some country singer who's popular.
 
zitothebrave said:
I'm not going to fully get into this argument if the intent is to split hairs on costs to put on a performance. Because if that's the kind of waste people want to talk about we can probably find out how much money republicans put into events on trump's property.

They didn't pay for endorsements, it's a stupid strategy and as I said paying someone who's biggest base is young minority women doesn't seem like the smartest use of money, it would have been smarter to pay some country singer who's popular.
Click to expand...

Then maybe they executed a stupid strategy…

…is there a reason why we should give the Harris campaign the benefit of the doubt? They didn’t exactly do anything to earn it.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top