TLHLIM

Right wing logic.

75594657_10156673948173244_5617003215196258304_n.png
 
Did you go read the article?

I haven’t yet

But even though I know you haven’t either

I feel like I should ask
 
Did you go read the article?

I haven’t yet

But even though I know you haven’t either

I feel like I should ask

Well, it advocated for racial reparations in the "article" (snicker) header, so I know the author is a jackass without needing to read it.

But incidentally, I did read the introduction, so I know it's just another ignorant screed about the Electoral College being racist and America being racist and oh this would be so good for racial justice because there aren't enough white people who feel guilty about things they didn't do to approve monetary reparations so we should let all the black people count twice so they can set up government institutions that are just.

Another bigot, judging people by the color of the skin while complaining that people were judged by the color of their skin. You guys should stop employing and listening to people this stupid, people who've never had an original thought in their head since they stopped attending classes taught by Marxist professors who were the only ones who couldn't get laid in the 60s protests. They're making all of you look stupid.
 
How is "I haven't seen you in ages" less offensive than "Long time, no see"?

So long time, no see is translated from Chinese and grammatically awkward. But they both seem pretty ableist to me. And ageist, implying that older things are worse.
 
At some point we can only blame society and ourselves for not dealing with these people. They should have been mocked and beaten up during school, instead we coddled them and allowed them to find careers in academia. Now we should all be laughing at them and refusing to pay them any attention.
 
Gosh I can't imagine why our young people can't handle adversity anymore

[Tw]1342853141642031107[/tw]

I think some of this list is certainly pretty sad, but do wonder about the joke regarding Hegel. How would adhering to these —again, kind of overboard— style suggestions fundamentally change the teachings of Hegel?

Also, this appears to be a guide for the IT department to deal with “customers.” This would have no bearing over teaching anything and is meant for a narrow scope. Is it still a bit too far? Yeah, but it’s not an example of a changing curriculum.
 
Last edited:
Back
Top