TLHLIM

mqt said:
You can pretend that’s the intent behind this, but they just posted that to point and laugh at a person for venting to their friends about something they admit is nobody’s fault.
Click to expand...
Yes I believe mockery is more effective than lying to them

But that post specifically was more mocking people like you. That a dog is more honest than a leftist
 
sturg33 said:
I cannot fathom how a rational mind gets to this policy for any other reason than intentional destruction of its people and economy

https://twitter.com/x/status/2022400407344157120
Click to expand...
Then you don’t have a very strong imagination. There’s plenty to criticize when it comes to various ways the left in particular looks at taxation, but it’s not overly complicated to understand how they get there. They want to fund public services without placing the explicit tax burden on the poor citizens they seek to help. We can discuss the negative externalities and ask if such policies are wise, but they’re pretty easy to figure out an explanation that isn’t willful destruction.
 
mqt said:
Then you don’t have a very strong imagination. There’s plenty to criticize when it comes to various ways the left in particular looks at taxation, but it’s not overly complicated to understand how they get there. They want to fund public services without placing the explicit tax burden on the poor citizens they seek to help. We can discuss the negative externalities and ask if such policies are wise, but they’re pretty easy to figure out an explanation that isn’t willful destruction.
Click to expand...
Well I can imagine why a 5 year old would think this is smart, but not a serious policy proposal of an adult
 
sturg33 said:
Yes I believe mockery is more effective than lying to them

But that post specifically was more mocking people like you. That a dog is more honest than a leftist
Click to expand...
You’re missing a very obvious Door #3 where you just shut the fuck up and let them use their subreddit in peace.
 
sturg33 said:
Well I can imagine why a 5 year old would think this is smart, but not a serious policy proposal of an adult
Click to expand...
Sure, but we’ve already moved on from “there’s no other possible explanation beyond them literally wanting to intentionally destroy their country.” People don’t really understand economics to begin with (see tariffs vs. taxation) and this is a relatively niche topic within economics.

I am personally somewhat skeptical that the effects on something like this would be quite as dire as some make it out to be. My hunch is that as long as you make it relatively cheap to employ people, the market will tolerate taxation on personal finances more than the right believes. There are also serious people who reject the notion that economic growth should be prioritized to the extent that it is. I find that less compelling, but it’s not due to a desire to watch the world burn.
 
sturg33 said:
Nah thats dangerous. Their echo chamber of delusions is creating mass murderers
Click to expand...
That’s just your opinion. People aren’t going through these types of transitions because some internet trolls weren’t mean enough, and there’s no evidence to support that not bullying people online will lead to fewer murders.
 
mqt said:
Sure, but we’ve already moved on from “there’s no other possible explanation beyond them literally wanting to intentionally destroy their country.” People don’t really understand economics to begin with (see tariffs vs. taxation) and this is a relatively niche topic within economics.

I am personally somewhat skeptical that the effects on something like this would be quite as dire as some make it out to be. My hunch is that as long as you make it relatively cheap to employ people, the market will tolerate taxation on personal finances more than the right believes. There are also serious people who reject the notion that economic growth should be prioritized to the extent that it is. I find that less compelling, but it’s not due to a desire to watch the world burn.
Click to expand...
Ok so i just have to accept that the adults are retarded then. A great reason not to vote for them

Surely you understand how requiring a tax on a gain not yet realized is disastrous.
 
sturg33 said:
Ok so i just have to accept that the adults are retarded then. A great reason not to vote for them

Surely you understand how requiring a tax on a gain not yet realized is disastrous.
Click to expand...
I can! It’s not a policy I’d recommend. Just pointing out that there *are* rationalizations out there that aren’t intentional sabotage.
 
mqt said:
I already did. They’re attempting to raise revenue in a way that is not through the direct taxation of the lower classes. Not all rationalizations are equally valid.
Click to expand...
No im asking how it mathematically works on the people they are taxing. Even they are not retarded this should be explainable.
 
sturg33 said:
No im asking how it mathematically works on the people they are taxing. Even they are not retarded this should be explainable.
Click to expand...
I dunno, I was not consulted by them during the crafting of this policy and I’m not about to spend the rest of my Saturday researching a Dutch tax bill.
 
mqt said:
I dunno, I was not consulted by them during the crafting of this policy and I’m not about to spend the rest of my Saturday researching a Dutch tax bill.
Click to expand...
Ok so were back to square 1 where neither you nor I could possibly understand how this could work.

Either retarded or intentional destruction. I cant fathom another option
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top