Tapate50
Well-known member
We provide for our underprivileged MUCH more than those societies no? Maybe provide some parallels so we dolts can connect the dots to sociology 101.
TLHLIM
- Thread starter sturg33
- Start date
We provide for our underprivileged MUCH more than those societies no? Maybe provide some parallels so we dolts can connect the dots to sociology 101.
acesfull86
Well-known member
I maintain the victims of the crimes that would go unpunished disagree with you.
57Brave
Well-known member
you brought this up, and like I said, there has to be more to it. Let's assume they have thought this through. Including your scenario
Why not since you brought it up, you research it a bit and tell us what you find.
Like I said, on its face ---
You might be right, but, I like the forward thinking solution instead of the cradle to prison railroad people, citizens, are finding themselves
/////
Wonder if Harlan County, Kentucky or Grady County, Georgia aren't paying attention what happens
Last edited:
acesfull86
Well-known member
When I first read this, I thought the Bernie line was a joke and the Sarah woman was just some troll.
But no, she's actually running for mayor of Portland and Bernie actually endorsed her.
LOL, good grief.
cajunrevenge
Well-known member
Anyone putting Mao on a ballot shouldnt win.
57Brave
Well-known member
During a press conference Friday, the Canadian prime minister was asked what he thought about the right to depict Muhammed in relation to the recent public violence in France.
The prime minister answered that he would “always defend freedom of expression.” He then added: “But freedom of expression is not without limits. You can’t, for example, shout ‘fire’ in a crowded movie theatre; there are always limits. In a pluralistic, diverse and respectful society like ours, we must be aware of the impact of our words and actions on others, especially those communities and populations that still experience a great deal of discrimination.”
Justin Trudeau explained further how speech and even facts can hurt people.
“It is a matter of respect, not to seek to dehumanize or deliberately hurt. There is always an extremely important debate, a sensitive debate to have about possible exceptions on issues where one does not want to hurt, but often the intention is less important and the fact can still hurt, so in a society based on respect for others and listening and learning, let’s have these complex conversations responsibly.”
Justin Trudeau also condemned the attacks saying: “these terrorists, these murderers, do not represent any religion”
https://westphaliantimes.com/justin...izD4MyIHXxD_YULIFy9GS9piVkSHdGRLI3hLHuXdFf5n4
/////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////
...
means? ---- c'mon Grasshopper, you know
Telling the parts you left out
The prime minister answered that he would “always defend freedom of expression.” He then added: “But freedom of expression is not without limits. You can’t, for example, shout ‘fire’ in a crowded movie theatre; there are always limits. In a pluralistic, diverse and respectful society like ours, we must be aware of the impact of our words and actions on others, especially those communities and populations that still experience a great deal of discrimination.”
Justin Trudeau explained further how speech and even facts can hurt people.
“It is a matter of respect, not to seek to dehumanize or deliberately hurt. There is always an extremely important debate, a sensitive debate to have about possible exceptions on issues where one does not want to hurt, but often the intention is less important and the fact can still hurt, so in a society based on respect for others and listening and learning, let’s have these complex conversations responsibly.”
Justin Trudeau also condemned the attacks saying: “these terrorists, these murderers, do not represent any religion”
https://westphaliantimes.com/justin...izD4MyIHXxD_YULIFy9GS9piVkSHdGRLI3hLHuXdFf5n4
/////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////
...
means? ---- c'mon Grasshopper, you know
Telling the parts you left out
Last edited:
acesfull86
Well-known member
Shouting “fire” in a crowded theater and publishing a cartoon in a newspaper are not analogous. But at least Trudeau wiped off the blackface before lecturing us on responsible freedom of expression.
nsacpi
Expects Yuge Games
True. I prefer Macron's defense of blasphemy. Free speech isn't an absolute but it should be very high in our ranking of values to uphold.
57Brave
Well-known member
Which is pretty much what Trudeau was saying. Given an objective listen