chop2chip
Well-known member
Or they win state wide elections very recently in purple states like Virginia, Georgia, and Florida.
TLHLIM
- Thread starter sturg33
- Start date
Or they win state wide elections very recently in purple states like Virginia, Georgia, and Florida.
zitothebrave
Connoisseur of Minors
They won VA because the Dems in VA punted. I would bet a healthy chunk of change they lose in 2025.
zitothebrave
Connoisseur of Minors
It's wild to me your takes.
First off, you've turned the entire trans debate into transwomen are bad. Somehow you've ignored transmen entirely.
Secondly, violence is bad, I didn't see any violence here. I can understand she was afraid as a group of protestors yelled at her calling her a bitch. She should sue the staff of SFSU for not giving her an easy and safe exit. ALso for booking her knowing she would piss off their students.
There are plenty of pictures online where the trans girl outwardly or at least facially looks better than a lot of real girls due to surgery, makeup, etc.
That doesn't make a straight man change his tune at all. It just means that physically they tricked your eye into thinking they are the opposite sex.
In the end it's still just a guy with surgery and a lot of makeup. Whether or not someone is attracted to them or would still go through with sexual activity is irrelevant to the fact that the person is still just a man wearing makeup. If that's your thing or someone else's thing, then that's fine. But reality is still reality. Surgery and makeup does not make someone the opposite sex.
sturg33
I
She was punched twice
And you're blaming the staff of SFSU for not providing safe exit from a violent mob, rather than the violent mob
zitothebrave
Connoisseur of Minors
If I was in the deep south. And I went to I don't know bum**** bible thumping "University" and did a speech on protecting transrights, I would expect to get accosted.
She alleges she was punched twice, I didn't see anything on video.
sturg33
I
ahh so the victim shoulda known better than to mess with the trans mob, then!
And that girl who got raped was totally asking for it with that skirt
zitothebrave
Connoisseur of Minors
Here comes the king of false equivalencies striking again.
sturg33
I
Teleport yourself 10 years ago and ask yourself if you would support a University leader justifying an attack on a young woman because she doesn't believe men should compete in her sport
The left has gone clinically insane in the effort to support the clinically insane
[Tw]1644400078218735616[/tw]
The left has gone clinically insane in the effort to support the clinically insane
[Tw]1644400078218735616[/tw]
That's some serious dedication to your political party. For some reason I doubt you would have had sex with a man 10 years ago.
zitothebrave
Connoisseur of Minors
Who said that?
I mean the core of this is that you and sturg don't believe someone can change genders. I'm an older school person in that I don't believe transwomen are the same as ciswomen. But I wouldn't call a transgendered woman a man like you ans sturg are. Which again, is seemingly the only one you have an issue with. You don't seem to be have an issue witha Transman.
I still don't think there's a transwoman I would find attractive. But unlike you and sturg, I wouldn't kill the person if I found out after I got my rocks off.
zitothebrave
Connoisseur of Minors
Absolutely. You do realize gender is strictly socially constructed. What a man or woman froma gender perspective is traditionally biologically established, but that's because of how we asa society have constructed them.
Sex is different than gender.
I know it's difficult to transition from pretend land back to the real world but a man is a man and a woman is a woman. No amount of surgery, makeup and wishing upon a star will ever change that fact. All the same applies with trans men as well. I don't know why you think that is your big gotcha. As if we think trans men are really men lol. We are in reality bud. The same laws of biology apply to everyone other than a very minute part of the population that were born with birth defects.
I wouldn't kill the person either but I would never get to the point where my rocks were getting off because I know that women don't have penises. You know they don't as well but yet you pretend they do because you have to perpetuate the lie because that's what your political side is doing.
Gender is not a social construct. Gender roles are a social construct. A man cannot become a woman and a woman cannot become a man. If they want to perform the gender roles of the opposite sex, they can do some of them but not all. Men cannot have babies. Women cannot impregnate men. Men cannot have a menstrual cycle. Now roles that do not involve biology like working on cars, washing dishes, mowing the lawn, doing laundry etc. Yes, those roles can be done by either gender.
Your entire philosophy is completely torn to shreds by the simple question of "What is a woman?". I mean that right there should tell you that you're off in fantasy land with your ideologies again.
sturg33
I
the simplest questions of logic completely make fools of leftists. they are in a delusion that is so arbitrary it can't hold up from one sentence to the next.
in our exchange, zito declared he would not have sex with a man... full stop.
He then declared he would potentially willing to have sex with a trans woman.
Based on zito's logic above... the "socially constructed concept of gender" outweighs the biological anatomy when he is choosing a sexual partner
how insane is that?
[tw]1644370262039592961[/tw]
She messed up with a little bit of honesty there lol. She needs some training from Zito on how to deflect.
Now I will give Zito some respect because it took a while but he finally admitted that he would have sex with a guy who looks like a woman as long as that look was the type he normally goes for. Now whether he would go through with that or not, I have my doubts. I think it was just to keep from looking like a total lunatic to who is detached from reality but I guess that's neither here nor there.
Their entire argument is that gender is socially constructed. Therefore men can be women and women can be men. Yet when you look up the definition of a woman, it says a woman is an adult female. Look up the definition of a female and it describes 2 X chromosomes, vagina, ovaries, uterus, breasts etc. These are the same dictionaries that have been modified by the radical leftists and government propagandists over the last few years. Even they can't bring themselves to fully commit to this absurdity.
Even by using their logical fallacy, you still can't make yourself the opposite gender. This ideology has a simple dead end. Therefore it is false.
Disproving flat earth theory is more difficult than disproving this ideology. That's how ridiculous this ideology is.
zitothebrave
Connoisseur of Minors
A man is hardly a man and a woman hardly is a woman. You're putting a hard line somewhere arbitrarily in the middle. Ignoring transgendered individual and the surgical and hormonal treatment they can give people to move them through their transitions, intersex alone puts a giant hole through your arguement.
I mean I'm glad you're sticking to your story, but to simplify my counterpoint I'll steal a line from Chappelle Show "A mouth's a mouth" and I can't vouch for everyone, but I think the number of people I've had sex with who I saw naked before getting a handjob or blowjob is one.
Gender is a social construct. Gender is what says a man is this person, a woman is this person. Sex is biological. Sex is XX and XY, gender is applying a term. Consider again gendering of nouns in other languages.
That being said, unlike y'all I don't care how people define themselves. There's like an odd cult you have with obsessing over what people want to be.
zitothebrave
Connoisseur of Minors
The fact you think this is disheartening.