TOP 30 PROSPECTS: OPENING DAY EDITION

I wonder how much being 5'7 helps Albies draw walks. A lot of pitchers he sees have control issues to begin with but add in an even smaller strike zone and he should be walking a lot. Probably would walk a lot more if he didnt make so much contact.
 
I'll finish off with some observations on the overall state of the farm system. My first and most important point is that we do not have a surplus of pitching. There is a tendency to underestimate what is normal attrition for pitchers and pitching prospects. In planning for the future, the front office has to proceed from the assumption that attrition will be normal. If our luck in that regard turns out to be better or worse than normal, it can then adjust to those developments. But the basic plan has to be based upon normal attrition or the most likely outcome. And under normal attrition (where one bona fide starting pitching prospect gets eliminated per level each year) we do not have a surplus of starting pitching prospects. As an aside, I will note that our luck in recent years has been worse than normal. If just two of Hanson, Jurrjens, Medlen, Beachy and Minor had gone through their arb years without injury, there would have been no consideration of punting on 2015 and 2016. And I won't even mention the relievers: Venters, Simmons, Viz.

Moving on from pitching, there is one area we have a significant surplus. Middle infield. We have Simmons and Peterson in the majors (and a bench guy in Gosselin who I think is generally undervalued around here). Then Peraza, Albies, Castro, Reyes, Obregon, Camargo and some others who didn't make my top thirty: Ray-Patrick Didder, Luke Dysktra and Alejandro Salazar. I might add that normal attrition for middle infield prospects is a lot lower than for pitchers. So if there is one area where we have some trade chips it is middle infielders. We also have the option of moving some of these guys to other positions, notably third and center.

The weakest position in our system is catcher. I know you can't draft based on need, but it would be nice to pick up a bona fide catching prospect in this year's draft.

We also have an obvious need for power and more specifically right-handed power in our system. The path to the majors for that type of player would appear to be at third or a corner outfield spot. Maybe Dustin Peterson turns out to be that type of player, but I'm not sold yet.

There will be some financial flexbility at the major league level to use payroll to fill in the areas where the farm is not producing what the team needs. The obvious areas where we could spend some dinero over the next two years are catcher, left, and third. We are also likely to make a couple moves to pick up veteran relievers like we did with Grilli and Joe Johnson this past off-season.

I agree. Basically, the farm system has deteriorated a lot, and I attribute most of that to the change in drafting philosophy from Roy Clark to Tony DeMacio. The front office did a great job of trying to restock the farm system this past off season, but more is needed. The Braves have 6 of the top 89 picks in the draft this year, and this is a great chance for them to really reload the farm system with some high level prospects.
 
It doesn't concern me, at least not yet. Given his incredibly high walk rate, it's probable that the K rate is due more to unnecessarily high patience, not just swinging and missing. Stanton had a similar K rate at 18 in A ball and a considerably lower, though still good, walk rate. His walk rate improved while his K rate came down as he progressed through the minors, then his K rate has sat around 27-28% for his major league career, which is similar to the K rate of both him and Davidson in A ball.

Obviously Stanton hit much better overall in A than Davidson has so far, but I'm not concerned. He probably needs to be more aggressive, but I'd rather see a guy who is walking a ton and K'ing a lot than a guy who isn't striking out much but also isn't walking. We just need to see his average come up.

I'm not big on high K guys, but if you are going to strike out a lot, you need to off set that with power, not walks.
 
I agree. Basically, the farm system has deteriorated a lot, and I attribute most of that to the change in drafting philosophy from Roy Clark to Tony DeMacio. The front office did a great job of trying to restock the farm system this past off season, but more is needed. The Braves have 6 of the top 89 picks in the draft this year, and this is a great chance for them to really reload the farm system with some high level prospects.

We also picked up some international slot money from the Cubs and Padres. And our own slot money for the upcoming signing season (and presumably the next one) will be higher than usual due to our not being a playoff team. The international signings (because they are so young) will naturally fill up the lower levels of the system over the next couple years. Attrition is very high for players that young but if a handful pan out, it can make a big difference.
 
Back
Top