TRHLIM
- Thread starter cajunrevenge
- Start date
cajunrevenge
Well-known member
The first one is an opinion piece and talks about the case but doesn't say Trump is guilty of collusion. The second is just a timeline of the Don Jr Trump tower meeting. Again, no one claiming collusion was a proven fact. Third is about the female Russian agent, again no one claiming collusion was a proven fact. The last ones not even about Trump. You really just proved my point. Anyone reports on aspects of the Russia stuff and you people claim they are saying Trump is guilty. The person responsible for convincing people Trump was guilty of collusion was Trump with his constant panicked reaction to it all. Acting like the 5 year old caught stealing cookies from the cookie jar
cajunrevenge
Well-known member
You shouldn't have any problems showing it to me then. What you people have done is the equivalent of someone saying ESPN said the Braves are going to win the world series because they showed highlights of a game on sportscenter. Reporting on the aspects of the investigation is not saying Trump is guilty.
cajunrevenge
Well-known member
Cool. So I can come around here and say the media said Biden was an alien from Mars but don't ask for proof. It's a waste of my time.
sturg33
I
Tapate50
Well-known member
That’s how you know you aren’t taken seriously.
Tapate50
Well-known member
It’s embarassing but honestly I don’t think leftist have shame anymore
If all of this group here was in Russia in the 70s and 80s it's really not hard to figure out which ones of us would be believing what Pravda was spewing out every day.
Tapate50
Well-known member
They all maintain they’d be on the correct side of history on all issues as well. It’s hilarious
So in your mind, since they didn't specifically say "He's guilty" then it never happened....
That's some thethe level mental gymnastics
sturg33
I
I have a liberal friend who is adamant that the 51 intelligence officials didn't mislead anyone because they said the laptop "appeared to be Russian disinformation" vs "definitely was Russian misinformation"
they just had an oopsie!
The problem with that logic is that the FBI knew that the laptop was authentic since 2019.
The 51 intel guys still had security clearance and the CIA agent who put this operation together was still active.
The fact they somehow didn't know this is absolute BS.
They were requested to release the letter as well by the regime to get out in front of what should have been a disqualifying event.
Again - 13% of Biden 'voters' stated that they would not have voted for Joe if they knew about the laptop and its contents.
Aside from actually stealing Americans votes through BS ballot harvesting the election was stolen in broad daylight.
sturg33
I
Exactly
It will be quite difficult to get these guys on a conviction except for the CIA agent who put this together because it's a clear violation of the Hatch Act.
The best thing to do is take their security clearances away which will damage their pocketbook.
zitothebrave
Connoisseur of Minors
[tw]1802725174707663176[/tw]
Rightwing twittersphere losing their mind over Jack Black endorsing Biden was not on my 2024 bingocard.
Rightwing twittersphere losing their mind over Jack Black endorsing Biden was not on my 2024 bingocard.
zitothebrave
Connoisseur of Minors
zitothebrave
Connoisseur of Minors
I'll give crypto-bro credit, at least he's not dogwhistling. He's just putting it right out there he's a ****ing horrible person.
[tw]1803495571266650323[/tw]
[tw]1803495571266650323[/tw]