TRHLIM

[tw]1906563046736060787[/tw]

Cast aside personal security and the opportunity cost of his time is the weirdest ****ing way to describe someone hosting a political rally.
 
****ing WILD way to view liberal protests of late my guy.

Two attempts on Trump and another thwarted, and all the property damage in the name of “acceptance”?

How’s deep is your head in the sand ?
 
[tw]1906888487292559531[/tw]

Not gonna lie, I wouldn’t make an admissions decision that brought this ****ing weirdo to my hometown either.
 
[tw]1907241754836746431[/tw]

Nothing says you’re arguing in good faith quite like questioning the reporting at 7:30 PM Central and blindly accepting that it’s a stolen election by 8:20.
 
mqt said:
[tw]1906888487292559531[/tw]

Not gonna lie, I wouldn’t make an admissions decision that brought this ****ing weirdo to my hometown either.
Click to expand...

He applied and got rejected from hard to get into schools. And for some reason thinks his business would get him into these schools? Only if you paid them for a a wing. Like he realizes by swinging for the biggest fences (Ivy league,etc.) you're gonna get misses. I know kids who had all the acolades and didn't get into MIT. The one kid I know who got into Princeton was Legacy and had all those things, perfect GPA, high test scores, so on so forth.
 
91z8jlvn0cse1.jpeg


Kill a CEO death to you, kill 23 hispanic folks, you get to live.

Justice for thee not for me.
 
zitothebrave said:
91z8jlvn0cse1.jpeg


Kill a CEO death to you, kill 23 hispanic folks, you get to live.

Justice for thee not for me.
Click to expand...

Montoya said he supports the death penalty and believes Crusius deserves it. But he said he met with the families of the victims and there was an overriding desire to conclude the process, though some relatives were willing to wait as long as it took for a death sentence.

“The vast majority of them want this case over and done with as quickly as possible,” he said.

Montoya also said pursuing the death penalty would mean a long and drawn-out legal battle with many hearings and appeals.

“I could see a worst-case scenario where this would not go to trial until 2028 if we continued to seek the death penalty,” he said.

Montoya, a Democrat, took office in January after defeating a Republican incumbent who was appointed by Republican Gov. Greg Abbott. Montoya’s predecessors supported sending Crusius to death row.

“I’ve heard about it. I think the guy does deserve the death penalty, to be honest,” Abbott said Tuesday about the decision. “Any shooting like that is what capital punishment is for.”



—————

Shrugs. Take it up with (D), I guess.

A (D) prosecutor decides to not pursue the death penalty and this is an example of the right losing its mind??
 
acesfull86 said:
Montoya said he supports the death penalty and believes Crusius deserves it. But he said he met with the families of the victims and there was an overriding desire to conclude the process, though some relatives were willing to wait as long as it took for a death sentence.

“The vast majority of them want this case over and done with as quickly as possible,” he said.

Montoya also said pursuing the death penalty would mean a long and drawn-out legal battle with many hearings and appeals.

“I could see a worst-case scenario where this would not go to trial until 2028 if we continued to seek the death penalty,” he said.

Montoya, a Democrat, took office in January after defeating a Republican incumbent who was appointed by Republican Gov. Greg Abbott. Montoya’s predecessors supported sending Crusius to death row.

“I’ve heard about it. I think the guy does deserve the death penalty, to be honest,” Abbott said Tuesday about the decision. “Any shooting like that is what capital punishment is for.”


—————

Shrugs. Take it up with (D), I guess.

A (D) prosecutor decides to not pursue the death penalty and this is an example of the right losing its mind??
Click to expand...

Lol ok

That backfired on ya
 
zitothebrave said:
You're such a moron. I swear you have the brain of a fish. I'm not a fan of personally attacking people, but you have the equivalent of a punchable face for an online persona. COngrats I guess?
Click to expand...

Sorry it blew up in your face. But that’s not my fault.
Maybe stop acting like a know it all dbag?

Or just please keep going lol
 
Tapate50 said:
Sorry it blew up in your face. But that’s not my fault.
Maybe stop acting like a know it all dbag?

Or just please keep going lol
Click to expand...

I already addressed aces an intelligent poster who I dont' agree with most of the time. You decided to just ignore that whole post.
 
zitothebrave said:
More that the DOJ is going for the death penalty than anything involving Texas.
Click to expand...

I think they should go after the death penalty in the Luigi case. If we’re going to have a death penalty, this seems to be an appropriate time to use it - premeditated murder caught on film. There’s no risk of the state sending an innocent man to death here.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
acesfull86 said:
I think they should go after the death penalty in the Luigi case. If we’re going to have a death penalty, this seems to be an appropriate time to use it - premeditated murder caught on film. There’s no risk of the state sending an innocent man to death here.
Click to expand...

Do they though? I mean first off I think from the logistics aspect they'll find it incredibly hard to not find a biased jury. From a trial stand point this has all the vibes of a mistrial, of a case that gets buried in appeals and etc. which will just lead to a huge cost.

Compare it to the Boston Bomber who was actually caught red handed actually committed a terrorist act, etc. he's still going through appeals all these years later.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top