TRHLIM

Well I agree with that. They have done everything with hate crimes that people warned about. But because the examples they used were brutal crimes few wanted to vote against it. Much like civil asset forfeiture how it was sold is not how it is used. The people deserving of hate crimes are already getting decades in prison if not life. But we knew it was a trick. Now they are using it for retarded shit. Soon if you object to the opposite sex being in the bathroom with you that's a hate crime. Don't want to use someone's pronouns. Hate crime. Disagree with application of hate crimes. That's a hate crime. It's all been a con so they can expand it to be the thought police.
I actually agree with you on the hate crime side. I understand the intent, but it’s most often used for malicious prosecution. Charlie is absolutely trying to pretend that the uproar over Trump’s EO on flag burning is related here though, and this isn’t the same issue. These were acts of vandalism that surely may have been over-prosecuted, but they weren’t jailing people for protected speech.
 
Back
Top