Trump aide indicted for selling Intel to Russia.

Forever Fredi said:
She's not head of DNC anymore. Tom Perez is.

And if your memory served you correct, most of us on the left here think DWS is a word that rhymes with runt. I'm sure I ranted about her several times during the Obama years.

She almost took down the entire Iran deal. She managed the debates horribly in HRC's favor during the primaries.

I hope she goes to jail.

Does that satisfy you sturg?
Click to expand...

Well that was rather sexist. Why even go there?
 
Forever Fredi said:
When I use that word it has nothing to do with female genitalia.

Im using it in the way it's popularly used in England and simply to mean piece of sh--.
Click to expand...

Morceau de merde is the preferred usage. As usual, leave it to the French to come up with the most elegant verbiage.
 
C--t is used so commonly in UK just as a general meaning of s.o.b. or p.o.s. Ive watched too much English football with English people to know that. Wanker, c--t, bloody, bullocks.
 
It would also be nice if we didn't have to beg you guys to condemn obviously condemn-able acts.

When it related to Charlottesville, not doing so meant you were defending Nazis (yet, EVERYONE condemned them).

rules don't seem to apply both ways, though
 
DWS is not same as Trump.

Most libs here do not like DWS except maybe 57. There are plenty of Trumpies here.

I dont need to go out of my way to condemn DWS because I already didn't like here and I've said it several times before on here as others have. Meanwhile thethe, krg, Jaw, to an extent Hawk, and others have made it clear they're going to defend Trump no matter what. Although I do think Hawk does it most of the time the same reason you do. Just to try and annoy the libs here. That's why I don't feel the need to respond to every "Will the left condemn this" comment that you and thethe have posted for the last few months.

Its usually the the same thing. You post a question of why haven't the libs condemned such and such. Thethe comes in and says because they refuse to ignore the globalist agenda and then krg backs up thethe with "the left has no idea they do it all the time"/insert ridiculous false equivalence.
 
DWS is a morceau de merde.

But Trump is a yuge morceau de merde. Much yuger.

Let's keep some perspective around here. It's important. We must try to peer through the haze of low expectations.
 
Forever Fredi said:
DWS is not same as Trump.

Most libs here do not like DWS except maybe 57. There are plenty of Trumpies here.

I dont need to go out of my way to condemn DWS because I already didn't like here and I've said it several times before on here as others have. Meanwhile thethe, krg, Jaw, to an extent Hawk, and others have made it clear they're going to defend Trump no matter what. Although I do think Hawk does it most of the time the same reason you do. Just to try and annoy the libs here. That's why I don't feel the need to respond to every "Will the left condemn this" comment that you and thethe have posted for the last few months.

Its usually the the same thing. You post a question of why haven't the libs condemned such and such. Thethe comes in and says because they refuse to ignore the globalist agenda and then krg backs up thethe with "the left has no idea they do it all the time"/insert ridiculous false equivalence.
Click to expand...

I criticized trump for sending troops to afghanistan. I've criticized him for his childish actions on twitter. You just fail to see that because unless someone is 100% against trump you consider them 100% for him.
 
thethe said:
I criticized trump for sending troops to afghanistan. I've criticized him for his childish actions on twitter. You just fail to see that because unless someone is 100% against trump you consider them 100% for him.
Click to expand...

And we just called DWS a morceau de merde.

But Trump is a much yuger morceau de merde. Much yuger. Would you agree with that. Feel free to disagree. I don't want to pressure you into agreement.
 
nsacpi said:
Wasserman Schultz sold them intel?
Click to expand...

........and somewhere 57 is sobbing.

She was suppose to lead the Dems in 2020......oh wait......what is that sound?

I guess calling herself partial American Indian is not going to be the punching bag they were going to use and now this.......oh vey!
 
Forever Fredi said:
DWS is not same as Trump.

Most libs here do not like DWS except maybe 57. There are plenty of Trumpies here.

I dont need to go out of my way to condemn DWS because I already didn't like here and I've said it several times before on here as others have. Meanwhile thethe, krg, Jaw, to an extent Hawk, and others have made it clear they're going to defend Trump no matter what. Although I do think Hawk does it most of the time the same reason you do. Just to try and annoy the libs here. That's why I don't feel the need to respond to every "Will the left condemn this" comment that you and thethe have posted for the last few months.

Its usually the the same thing. You post a question of why haven't the libs condemned such and such. Thethe comes in and says because they refuse to ignore the globalist agenda and then krg backs up thethe with "the left has no idea they do it all the time"/insert ridiculous false equivalence.
Click to expand...

I hate the Afghanistan decision, the tweeting, the habit of saying the stupidest things at the worst possible time, and just the general jackassery. I admit that I am disappointed with how his Presidency has started off. Part of his lack of success has been an incredibly hostile media, but a greater part has been his amazing skill at shooting himself in the foot.

But I like the nationalism, the deregulation, the immigration stance, and, as the main reason I voted for him, the Supreme Court pick.
 
Forever Fredi said:
When I use that word it has nothing to do with female genitalia.

Im using it in the way it's popularly used in England and simply to mean piece of sh--.
Click to expand...

Seems weaselly to me. Just don't use it. Like using the n word. I don't get why folks choose to use either with the connotations involved.
 
BedellBrave said:
Or say you just don't like her and/or her actions, instead of using any sexist verbiage. Imagine that.
Click to expand...

I usually say that for people I just kind of detest. But DWS has made it into the ranks of Mitch McConnell, the Congressman from Utah that just left office, Alex Jones, Limbo, Hannity, that have all earned the title of me calling them a c--t.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top