cajunrevenge
Well-known member
My point stands because even without the "inflated" value they still loaned him the money, didn't they? Why did they loan him the money even though he wasn't at the 2.5 billion threshold? You know why? Because they know how subjective all of this really is. Just because their assessment is different than Trump's own doesn't make either one right or wrong. I can go along with the idea his brand isn't as valuable as he thinks it is because I don't know either way but it's not the courts' business to decide.
According to this judge if I had assessed that property I discussed earlier at 100K while they valued it at 10k I committed fraud at that exact time. See how stupid all of this is? It's too subjective.
Wheres the limit. If I apply for a loan and list my 94 Nissan Altima as an asset worth 12 million dollars is it still subjective? Theres reasonable mistakes and high estimations and then theres what Trump did. If people could just make up whatever amounts they want there would be no reason to even ask for financial disclosures for loans or for it to be against the law to lie on them. As I pointed out he grossly inflated assets even on properties he said he didnt include his brand value.