Trump Indictment Watch

I hate to disappoint you but it does occupy only a fraction of my life. I can, and I know this shocks you, do several things at once.
 
nsacpi said:
not as exciting as the unearthing of a july 2021 article proving the efficacy of ivermectin
Click to expand...

I'm sure all of the doctors on the frontlines who swear Ivermectin works can't be correct either. Who we need to listen to are the experts who have been wrong on nearly every topic regarding Covid. They have the answers we seek.
 
The left labeled Dr Kory and others with crackpot labels, despite being some of the most decorated and published doctors in the world (Something you'd think a fellow professional academic would respect)

Covid made people legit crazy.
 
The funny thing about the buffoon and ivermectin is he spent hundreds of posts telling us how effective the vaccine is.

You know... The one that doesn't stop you from getting the virus, at all. The one that only "works" if everyone has it... The one that requires not 3 additional boosters, and one each year or sooner to work. The one that gives young people heart issues and women menstrual issues?

Give me ivermectin all ****ing day. Give me a sugar pill if necessary
 
A special grand jury that investigated election interference by former President Donald J. Trump and his allies in Georgia recommended indictments of multiple people on a range of charges in its report, most of which remains sealed, the forewoman of the jury said in an interview today.

“It is not a short list,” the forewoman, Emily Kohrs, said, adding that the jury had appended eight pages of legal code “that we cited at various points in the report.”

She declined to discuss who specifically the special grand jury recommended for indictment, since the judge handling the case decided to keep those details secret when he made public a few sections of the report last week. But seven sections that are still under wraps deal with indictment recommendations, Ms. Kohrs said.

Asked whether the jurors had recommended indicting Mr. Trump, Ms. Kohrs gave a cryptic answer: “You’re not going to be shocked. It’s not rocket science,” adding “you won’t be too surprised.”

A focal point of the Atlanta inquiry is a call that Mr. Trump made on Jan. 2, 2021, to Brad Raffensperger, the Georgia secretary of state, in which he pressed Mr. Raffensperger, a fellow Republican, to recalculate the results and “find” 11,780 votes, or enough to overturn his loss in the state.

“We definitely started with the first phone call, the call to Secretary Raffensperger that was so publicized,” said Ms. Kohrs, whom The Associated Press first named and spoke with on Tuesday about the election meddling investigation.

“I will tell you that if the judge releases the recommendations, it is not going to be some giant plot twist,” she added. “You probably have a fair idea of what may be in there. I’m trying very hard to say that delicately.”

https://www.nytimes.com/2023/02/21/...Y1yWSpJl__-VFDjd7xcUmHi0XIjpvW&smid=url-share

Emily Kohrs. What kind of name is that. Sounds like a pedo woke commie kind of name.
 
Last edited:
21nat-trump-georgia-01-jgph-jumbo.jpg
 
“The people of Georgia are angry, the people in the country are angry. And there’s nothing wrong with saying, you know, um, that you’ve recalculated. So what are we going to do here folks? I only need 11,000 votes. Fellas, I need 11,000 votes. Give me a break.”
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top