Trump Indictment Watch

nsacpi said:
Actually, I don't think his activities on January 6 constitute insurrection (though there was plenty of dereliction of duty). But his broader activities in trying to overturn an election was an attempt to subvert the constitution and prevent the peaceful transfer of power to a duly elected president. On those grounds I think he should be disqualified under the 14th amendment.
Click to expand...

According to immigrant nsacpi?
 
sturg33 said:
So the state ruled on the argument of a bunch of losers who believed the most peaceful protest of 2020/2021 was an insurrection?

If the bar is that low, I may take some action
Click to expand...


The lawsuit was brought by 6 Republican voters and the state was a defendant in the case. The lawsuit sought to compel the state to take an action. And the insurrection was the entirety of the actions taken to subvert the election results. Anyone is free to use all their legal options to challenge election results. When a person legal options run out and they continue to seek to subvert the results and use means of intimidation to try to forcibly change the results they are engaging in an insurection.
 
cajunrevenge said:
The lawsuit was brought by 6 Republican voters and the state was a defendant in the case. The lawsuit sought to compel the state to take an action. And the insurrection was the entirety of the actions taken to subvert the election results. Anyone is free to use all their legal options to challenge election results. When a person legal options run out and they continue to seek to subvert the results and use means of intimidation to try to forcibly change the results they are engaging in an insurection.
Click to expand...

Again, why would I care about who brought the case?

Has trump been convicted of a crime?

Are you telling me that sturg33 can find a super red jury to opine on Joe Biden committing treason with his border policies... and you'd be perfectly fine with it?

You're saying 6 people brought a case to a state that had nothing to do with Jan 6... and a completely Democrat judicial ruled against their political opposition

And that's a good thing?
 
sturg33 said:
Are you telling me that sturg33 can find a super red jury to opine on Joe Biden committing treason with his border policies... and you'd be perfectly fine with it?
Click to expand...

i wouldn't have a problem with voters trying something similar against credibly accused creepy joe

their attorneys might end up being sanctioned if they draw a judge who doesn't like frivolous lawsuits
 
sturg33 said:
a completely Democrat judicial ruled against their political opposition

And that's a good thing?
Click to expand...

we have to take the judiciary that we have

the court that will ultimately decide this matter has a majority of 6 conservative justices appointed by Republican presidents....that's ok with me
 
sturg33 said:
Still waiting on why immigrant nsacpi gets to tell us he is convinced Trump is guilty of a pepper spray insurrection and therefore we have to obide to the immigrant's political preference
Click to expand...

it's an opinion...no better or worse than anyone else's...the supreme court will ultimately adjudicate the matter
 
nsacpi said:
we have to take the judiciary that we have

the court that will ultimately decide this matter has a majority of 6 conservative justices appointed by Republican presidents....that's ok with me
Click to expand...

I have 2 questions

1. Do you believe this case is legimate? If so, why?

2. You would support a similar case that Joe Biden is treasonous for his border policies, if a TN court said so based a lawsuit from 6 republicans, and must be removed from the ballot. Is that accurate?
 
nsacpi said:
it's an opinion...no better or worse than anyone else's...the supreme court will ultimately adjudicate the matter
Click to expand...

So.we should be happy we have a system that a Supreme Court that has an advantage by 1 judge can decide if a political opponent is legitimate or not?

And you're the democracy defender?
 
sturg33 said:
I have 2 questions

1. Do you believe this case is legimate? If so, why?

2. You would support a similar case that Joe Biden is treasonous for his border policies, if a TN court said so based a lawsuit from 6 republicans, and must be removed from the ballot. Is that accurate?
Click to expand...

1. si (as explained in the post you quote at the top of this page)

2. sure...for ****s and giggles
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top