We already had livestreams of ballot harvesting in illegal means. Nothing happened to the criminals.
But if they were helping Republicans I'm sure there would be sentences.
Trump Indictment Watch
- Thread starter cajunrevenge
- Start date
We already had livestreams of ballot harvesting in illegal means. Nothing happened to the criminals.
But if they were helping Republicans I'm sure there would be sentences.
cajunrevenge
Well-known member
Sure buddy, let me guess, you are referring to the 2000 Mules BS? Easiest scam of D'Souza's life.
Yes I'm referring to video surveillance that showed people going up to drop boxes at 2AM with gloves on and taking selfies while they put a stack of votes in a drop box in states where ballot harvesting is illegal.
You know - Silly stuff like that.
cajunrevenge
Well-known member
So you watched the movie? Do you own a copy?
Obvious diversion for obvious reasons
cajunrevenge
Well-known member
Wut? I was hoping you did so you could tell me a description of any person shown to be dropping off ballots at multiple locations. I havent watched it since I couldnt find a free copy but from reviews I have read they say theres no one shown to drop off ballots at different locations. There is absolutely nothing wrong with anyone dropping off multiple ballots, wearing gloves, or taking a selfie. There is only 1 state that doesnt allow anyone but the voter to return the ballot and thats Alabama. Georgia specifically allows an immediate family member or household member to return the ballot for a person with physical disabilities.
Btw, whatever happened to that ballot harvesting operation you claimed was caught red handed? Even had a harvester that confessed if I remember correctly. You were all kinds of hyped about it. Whatever happened to that? Or how about all those criminal defense lawyers the election workers were hiring. Why dont you keep updating us on these stories. I desperately need your updates on these stories.
cajunrevenge
Well-known member
Thats an interesting take. Reality is Karen Lake's own star witness could not confirm that signature verification was not done when asked on the stand. Theres a better chance she and her lawyers will get sanctioned again for wasting the courts time than she does of winning the case.
"Signature Verification" happened because there was a documented process that votes passed through. In reality when you acutally audit the process and time to process that many signatures for real verification you know it didn't happen. Lakes expert witness has been an expert for these types of situations countless times and it considered an impeccable source.
Just state your disdain for questionable law enforcement tactics is conditional and we can move on.
Last edited:
I don't buy things that I can research on my own. Its a stupid thing to do.
The ballot harvesting operation was caught red handed but as usual the FBI won't investigate real cases and spend time with fake nooses.
Any reasonable person knows that GA was a sham and dems did everything possible to ensure those 10K fake ballots were never inspected. You know how it goes - If you think you won fair and square it makes sense to do everything possible to prevent inspection.
I know you're left of center on most things, Carp. I'm curious to what changed your mind on election fraud.
This is what I've been telling him. If the group or person is left of center he whines about the lack of justice. If the people in question are right of center he becomes a freaking bootlicker.
Probably the obvious election fraud but more importantly I'm assuming that people in the middle realize that was the establishment yells the most ends up being the opposite of the truth.
It isn't the illegal ballot harvesting I am mentioning (though it's obviously an issue as well). The legal ballot harvesting is the main culprit, as it was largely expanded "due to COVID", which was a cop out. They've been pushing ballot harvesting long before COVID. It's an unethical practice and Dems know it.
I most certainly am NOT left of center. I lean right on most issues. I am a big RDS supporter.
The recent court hearings have led me to believe there was likely more voter fraud than normal. I don't believe it's near the scale that thethe believes it is, but it likely could have affected the results in close states like GA and AZ, which were decided by 12k votes. But in all likelihood, Trump still loses MI, WI, and PA so it's a moot point in the Presidential election. However it certainly could have changed the outcome in the Senate and House races of those states (and maybe others)
Last edited:
My bad then. Thanks for answering my question.
If the popular vote was relevant, you might have a point.
He lost GA, AZ, and WI by a combined 43k votes. He wins those 3 and he is POTUS. I call that a pretty effing close race.
The Dems have swung and missed on ALL charges. Even the staunchest critics of Trump all agree the NY charges are paper thin, and will be easily bested in court. There are literally dozens of videos out there with Dem political analysts describing the NY charges as disappointing, because they know they are weak as ****. In GA, it's even more flimsy considering you have to prove intent.
Last edited: