Then why did he allow Cohen to do it?
They're going to defend this absolute nonsense to their very end.
Then why did he allow Cohen to do it?
Then why did he allow Cohen to do it?
The witness is there to testify to facts they know. Either side can object if he starts rambling about things besides those facts. Some witnesses are prone to digressing and both sides can ask the judge to intervene and instruct the jury to disregard testimony that goes beyond what the witness is there to testify about. I'm not a lawyer but this is fairly basic stuff. If the judge doesn't do his job in this or some other regard it opens up grounds for appeal. I think the digressions by Stormy Daniels about the details of her encounter with Trump were more prejudicial and more likely to bear fruit as an avenue of appeal. I'm surprised Trump's lawyers didn't object. But the judge also should have cut her off when she said things that implied he was a predator. Even sexual predators deserve fair judicial proceedings.
And yet the judge allowed it.
I'll be pretty surprised if they don't find him guilty.
This is NY. Best case scenario is a hung jury. However, I would love to be wrong though.
I've been informed that NY is very close to turning red so could be pretty split
Didn't he just hold a rally that attracted a massive crowd in the Bronx?
Trump 1000000000000000000000000000, BL 0
FIFY