Trump Trials Watch I

Roger Stone advocated for Nixon to stand trial and has argued for + 50 years he would have be exonerated.
Trump listened to Stone
 
images
 
I’m still pretty meh on this case due to how much gets swept under the rug, but taking a step back while these might have been minor violations of the existing law, it seems like there should be far more attention paid to these kinds of bookkeeping charges. If Cohen and Stormy Daniels had just kept their mouths shut, we wouldn’t know that the President of the United States had a fixer pay off an affair partner to improve his chances in the election. What the **** other fraudulent payments are out there on both sides of the aisle that aren’t just to clear up embarrassing stories?
 
Ryan Silvey
@RyanSilvey
·
May 30
It only takes ONE juror to hang a jury. Juror #2 answered that

Trump’s Truth Social was their only source of news and not even

THAT person voted Not Guilty on even ONE charge.

Please save your rigged/sham/kangaroo takes for your

echo-chamber friends & donors.
 
57Brave said:
Ryan Silvey
@RyanSilvey
·
May 30
It only takes ONE juror to hang a jury. Juror #2 answered that

Trump’s Truth Social was their only source of news and not even

THAT person voted Not Guilty on even ONE charge.

Please save your rigged/sham/kangaroo takes for your

echo-chamber friends & donors.
Click to expand...

Edited:

This is a misleading fact. The juror in question follows pro-Trump (including his Truth Social posts) and anti-Trump people on Twitter, so this isn’t a slam dunk. That said, the Trump legal team vetted these jurors, it’s not just a bunch of commies out to get Trump.
 
Last edited:
Juror 2 is an investment banker. He said his job required him to follow all sorts of news. That's the reason he followed Trump on Truth Social. He was just doing his job. It said nothing about his politics or ability to be a fair juror.
 
  • Like
Reactions: mqt
chop2chip said:
Trump Rapid Response team.. geez
Click to expand...

I do think it’s important to research and call out bull**** when it’s presented. There are a lot of valid reasons to think Trump is a bad person/candidate/President, but when you latch on to something that can be disproven, you give him and his supporters the opportunity to claim a conspiracy that doesn’t exist.
 
mqt said:
I do think it’s important to research and call out bull**** when it’s presented. There are a lot of valid reasons to think Trump is a bad person/candidate/President, but when you latch on to something that can be disproven, you give him and his supporters the opportunity to claim a conspiracy that doesn’t exist.
Click to expand...

Oh I agree. I was just joking with 57 (it’s his typical response when someone disputes him)
 
Juror #2 was their shot.
After reading TS regularly for his job or not
he decided guilty

Apparently nothing he read gave him pause.
5 hour deliberation ?
However I am heartened and feel more secure knowing
the Rapid Response Team is ever on the watch...
 
Wouldn't reading TS make the juror more likely to convict?

Not everyone is a fan of lying badly.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top