You're talking about a very, very narrow area here. It pretty much has to reach the level of false advertising. To rise to that it has to be either an attempt to defraud or something that is harmful. So you're talking about snake oil salesmen saying the bottle of stump water they have will cure baldness. Or advertising something as safe that you know is likely to harm the person buying it. And we're not talking about some nebulous eventual harm. We're talking about a direct injury.
Trying to prosecute a company for advocating a position that isn't factually sound is not at all acceptable. Just the fact that the government thought about trying it is scary.
LINK: US Attorney General: We’ve ‘Discussed’ Prosecuting Climate Change Deniers
Uh guys, this is kinda a big deal. Obama's administration wants to seek legal action against someone FOR WHAT THEY BELIEVE.
Regardless, this thread is not about global warming.
It's about the audacity of this administration to trying to prosecute beliefs.
Disney says hello!I totally agree with those here who say punishing in any way those who dissent or disagree is about as wrong as a democracy can get.
big if true
“This matter has been discussed. We have received information about it and have referred it to the FBI to consider whether or not it meets the criteria for which we could take action on,” said Attorney General Loretta Lynch, responding to a question from green activist Sen Sheldon Whitehouse at a Senate Judiciary Hearing.
Whitehouse said:
“The similarities between the mischief of the tobacco industry pretending that the science of tobacco’s dangers was unsettled and the fossil fuel industry pretending that the science of carbon emissions’ dangers is unsettled has been remarked on widely, particularly by those who study the climate denial apparatus that the fossil fuel industry has erected.”
“Under President Clinton, the Department of Justice brought and won a civil RICO action against the tobacco industry for its fraud. Under President Obama, the Department of Justice has done nothing so far about the climate denial scheme,”
correlation and causation and all that jazz
most people who go to see a therapist have depression or anxiety
the fasten your seat belt sign often precedes turbulence
otoh if the ice cores show a temporal relationship where increases in carbon in the atmosphere precede periods of warming then maybe there is some causation involved...i say maybe because there might be a third forcing variable that precedes both...life and science can be complicated
Did you plan to go to war with China and India to stop their emissions growth before or after the Ukraine mess is over?