If you want to draw parallels to the Hamels deal (where the Rangers also got pen help in Diekman) as Brian MacPherson did - http://www.providencejournal.com/sp...ould-be-blueprint-for-bostons-pitcher-pursuit - I'd argue that while Julio may not be quite the Pitcher Hamels is, their contracts make them a wash. Vizcaino is a better RP than Diekman. So if you use the blueprint from that trade, the Braves should expect a slightly better return than the Phillies got.
Philadelphia received Texas' #2 (Jake Thompson), #3 (Jorge Alfaro), and #5 (Nick Williams) prospects PLUS two other Top 30 pieces in Jerad Eickhoff and Alec Asher.
Boston's current #2 (Devers), #3 (Benintendi), #5 (Kopech) and extra pieces in Roniel Raudes and Austin Rei would be a similar package. Given the extra control the Sox would be getting over Julio and Arodys, I'd push for a "throw-in". A wildcard like Yoan Aybar.
If Dombrowski would go that far, I have to admit I'd be hard-pressed to say "yes". That's a fast-moving OF who could be ready next season, a power-hitting 3B who could be ready within a couple seasons, a couple more hard-throwers to add to the stable (one of which could be a replacement for Vizcaino soon), and another young C prospect, plus a lottery ticket Mallex-type CF with a 70-grade arm that you could try as a Pitcher if he can't hit. Again, I'm not particularly in favor of trading Teheran at all - but if we got that kind of haul for he and Vizcaino I'm not sure you could say "no".
Biggest difference is the Phils were about to start a rebuild, and the Braves are looking to end a rebuild.
With the lack of FA pitching options, and the stalling of top arms like Sims and Newcomb, I don't see any realistic scenario where the Braves trade Julio and end up being better in 2017, and maybe not even in 2018.