Where's the indictment against Bill Clinton?

V

VOLracious

Arizona Fall Leaguer
attachment.php


attachment.php


Are liberals just more comfortable prosecuting black males for sexual abuse of women than rich white guys. Liberals are the party of old white women!
 
what a weird ****ing forum that you tried to hotlink from

btw, those pics didn't show up for us
 
Got to love "absolutes!" Sure there's a comparison. No need for hyperbole. Both men are famous and have at least been well loved. Both men are powerful. Both men are horn-dogs - adulterers. Both men have been accused of sexual harassment and of rape. Both have abused their position of power over a younger woman or women.
 
BedellBrave said:
Got to love "absolutes!" Sure there's a comparison. No need for hyperbole. Both men are famous and have at least been well loved. Both men are powerful. Both men are horn-dogs - adulterers. Both men have been accused of sexual harassment and of rape. Both have abused their position of power over a younger woman or women.
Click to expand...

Clinton is/was a scumbag, But he was never accused of rape by 20 some odd women.
 
Krgrecw said:
So zito is in favor of rape as long as you don't rape 20 some odd women. Glad to know.
Click to expand...

No, you're accusing someone of something that there's pretty much no evidence of.

Clinton had one rape allegation, that's it.

What you're basically saying i sthat anyone could be guilty of a crime. Marco Rubio isn't a serial movie theater masturbator, but it doesn't mean he's not a movie theater masturbator.
 
zitothebrave said:
No, you're accusing someone of something that there's pretty much no evidence of.

Clinton had one rape allegation, that's it.

What you're basically saying i sthat anyone could be guilty of a crime. Marco Rubio isn't a serial movie theater masturbator, but it doesn't mean he's not a movie theater masturbator.
Click to expand...

That's one more than I have ever had. Bill Clinton used his power to abuse women. There's a very thin line between coercion and rape.
 
Krgrecw said:
That's one more than I have ever had. Bill Clinton used his power to abuse women. There's a very thin line between coercion and rape.
Click to expand...

There's a very thick line. I'm guessing Clinton abused it a few times. But he has never been accused for drugging people and raping them. Cosby had an MO. Unfortunately for Clinton's accuser, everyone else that accused Clinton was likely making things up. So her case gets a shadow of a doubt. And she unfortunately doesn't have any corroborating witnesses and no one saw Clinton at her hotel and no one even had records of her being there. Again, I'm not defending Clinton, but he and Cosby aren't even remotely comparable. If it comes out that he raped tons of women, then you have a point. Otherwise it's one person and your speculation.
 
Krgrecw said:
I'm not saying that Clinton is as bad as Cosby but Vol's original question stands.
Click to expand...

Well let me answer it for both of you because ****, you don't understand much of anything.

Arkansas's statute of limitation for rape is a few years. No limit with DNA evidence which I'm gonna assume there is none.

The rape happened in the late 70s, she didn't come out to talk about it until the late 90s.

So he's not being indicted because she didn't go to the police in the time she needed to for him to stand trial.

It's really quite simple.
 
BedellBrave said:
Got to love "absolutes!" Sure there's a comparison. No need for hyperbole. Both men are famous and have at least been well loved. Both men are powerful. Both men are horn-dogs - adulterers. Both men have been accused of sexual harassment and of rape. Both have abused their position of power over a younger woman or women.
Click to expand...
Both are men. Both live on planet earth. Both seem to like women. Okay, I agree. The comparisons are endless.

Clinton is a cad with an appetite for younger women, has been in a position to take advantage of it and has been accused of rape. Maybe he raped those women. While I tend to believe the women in these situations, he must have learned his lesson somewhere along the way. The Lewinsky scandal was just terrible judgement and lack of control.

Cosby's accusers tell much more disturbing stories, imo.
 
Runnin said:
Both are men. Both live on planet earth. Both seem to like women. Okay, I agree. The comparisons are endless.

Clinton is a cad with an appetite for younger women, has been in a position to take advantage of it and has been accused of rape. Maybe he raped those women. While I tend to believe the women in these situations, he must have learned his lesson somewhere along the way. The Lewinsky scandal was just terrible judgement and lack of control.

Cosby's accusers tell much more disturbing stories, imo.
Click to expand...

Why must he have learned his lesson? Flying around with Epstein sure doesn't make him look like he has.

Oh, and it wasn't just the young ones horn-dog Clinton hit up on, didn't he go after Jackie-O as well?

Even reading WaPo's "fact checker" is fascinating. The last paragraph's a hoot. Link
 
BedellBrave said:
Even reading WaPo's "fact checker" is fascinating. The last paragraph's a hoot. Link
Click to expand...
He's a cad, but he doesn't abuse women. If he did there would be more substantial accusations, especially by now.

Cosby, on the other hand, is positively diabolical.
 
One would think with all of these allegations vs Bill Clinton they would have tried impeachment
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top