Why Academics Leftists and Elitists Need to Treat Ordinary Americans With Respect

nsacpi

Expects Yuge Games
It's obvious that condescension from the Left has triggered this poor fellow. If only he and his culture and ideas and beliefs had been treated with dignity and respect.

FVkbB-EWAAIpFbF
 
I remind everyone why academics and experts are idiots... Can be laughed and ignored... And should be defunded from the government

[Tw]1545183908299677696[/tw]
 
If your research doesn't actively promote 'equity, inclusion, & anti-racism', it's not welcome.

I read the page he linked to, it doesn't actually say this. *shocked pikachu face*
 
I read the page he linked to, it doesn't actually say this. *shocked pikachu face*

"As a pilot program last year (for 2022 Convention Submissions), we asked people to write these statements during the submission process, but did not give them to reviewers (we required only the symposia, single presenter, and PD submissions to fill this out, posters and Undergraduate posters were exempt from this). We requested the submitters to please explain whether and how this submission advances the equity, inclusion, and anti-racism goals of SPSP. This may include, but is not limited to: The research participants in the sample; the methods used in the research; the members of the research team(s) involved in the work (e.g., background, diversity, career stage, affiliation type); the content of the presentation (e.g., critical theories, prejudice, equity, cross-cultural research).

Both the Convention committee and the Professional Development committee agreed that these statements were helpful in making final decisions.

We are now rolling the DEI statements out as part of the full review process this year. We will have the regular review process rubric set up using the four major review criteria with a holistic rating (alongside strength/rigor, contribution, and interest value), but we will have the reviewers rate the DEI separately. Instructions for the reviewers will be altered so as to give them feedback on how to use this information in doing their reviews (see below):"
 
  • Like
Reactions: Jaw
I clicked on a random page from the 2020 thread and saw this gem... So good

[tw]1322910480604794881[/tw]

the pros know

then I saw all the #1932 hashtags, and the grim reaper images galore.

This dude gets everything wrong all the time

His poor students
 
incumbents who have lost

2020 very poorly chosen one (margin of popular vote 4.5%)

1992 Bush (5.6%)

1980 Carter (9.7%)

Tis true. Wasserman and I were wrong by 1.1%. The repudiation was not quite as bad as the one endured by George HW Bush. So not quite the biggest since Jimmy Carter.
 
Last edited:
Didn't they need like a week to actually call the election?

(Not to mention all the extra days to count those extra votes they found!)
 
What does it tell you when sturg33 was more wise than the academics and experts™

[Tw]1545776204388610050[/tw]
 
What does it tell you when sturg33 was more wise than the academics and experts™

[Tw]1545776204388610050[/tw]

The problem is that the experts are forced to follow the current narrative or they're censored. Many experts were telling us the truth about Covid and the shots but they were soon whacked.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Jaw
The problem is that the experts are forced to follow the current narrative or they're censored. Many experts were telling us the truth about Covid and the shots but they were soon whacked.

Berenson and Malone need to win the highest civilian honor possible. They tried to warn humanity as early as most.
 
What does it tell you when sturg33 was more wise than the academics and experts™

[Tw]1545776204388610050[/tw]

Just wait till the fallout from the dirty vax flushed through the public consciousness.

An absolute disaster but it was always the intention of the PLANdemic.
 
It's obvious that condescension from the Left has triggered this poor fellow. If only he and his culture and ideas and beliefs had been treated with dignity and respect.

FVkbB-EWAAIpFbF

Did you just assume this person's gender? Negative 3 DEI points for you. Good thing you aren't on a tenure track, that's the type of mistake that derails careers in the elitist academic world.

I disagree with this person's display of public profanity. We drive past a house with a FJB flag in the yard and I find it uncouth.
 
fel·low
[ˈfelō]
NOUN
informal
a man or boy:
"he was an extremely obliging fellow"
synonyms:
man · boy · person · individual · soul · carl
(fellows)
a person in the same position, involved in the same activity, or otherwise associated with another:
"he was learning with a rapidity unique among his fellows"
synonyms:
companion · friend · crony · comrade · partner · associate · coworker · colleague · peer · equal · contemporary · brother · confrère · compeer · coeval · coequal
a member of a learned society:
"he was elected a fellow of the Geological Society"

My usage of fellow falls in the gender neutral third definition (bolded for emphasis). As in fellowship of the ring. Ladies highly welcomed.
 
Back
Top