You know what I would like to see?

An Umpire Strike Zone Evaluator.

It would be simple. An umpire is graded based on every non-swinging pitch on whether it was appropriately called or not, using the k-zone thingy. Any pitch that touches any part of the k-zone, should be considered a strike call. Anything outside of it, should be considered a ball call.

Then, we could have a grading system where MLB could evaluate their umpires. For example:

Jim Joyce - 91% accurate strike zone

CB Buchnor - 64% accurate strike zone

Am I the only one that thinks that would be cool? Additionally, pitchers could easily change their game plan based on the umpire they have. And lastly, umpires could see how much they suck, and try to improve.
 
An Umpire Strike Zone Evaluator.

It would be simple. An umpire is graded based on every non-swinging pitch on whether it was appropriately called or not, using the k-zone thingy. Any pitch that touches any part of the k-zone, should be considered a strike call. Anything outside of it, should be considered a ball call.

Then, we could have a grading system where MLB could evaluate their umpires. For example:

Jim Joyce - 91% accurate strike zone

CB Buchnor - 64% accurate strike zone

Am I the only one that thinks that would be cool? Additionally, pitchers could easily change their game plan based on the umpire they have. And lastly, umpires could see how much they suck, and try to improve.

I think this exists, but MLB has agreed to NOT share the results with the public. ;-)
 
Yes I'm pretty sure this already exists. I think some website actually keeps stats on umpires. It shows length of games, runs per game, and pitches per inning for every umpire when they are behind the plate
 
If it exists, where is it? Does his have "correct strikes called" %? Because that's what I care about.

Since we'll never get robots calling strikes, I'd at least like to be tracking it
 
cat-and-piranha.jpg
 
Back
Top