Latest activity

I will let my editor know to proof my post better.. it really shouldn't be hard to see the point someone is making and not getting...

Good grief, guys. I can understand conversations devolving into this when AA is sitting on his hands, but he actually gave us something...

Twisting themselves into pretzels to somehow claim Murphy has negative trade value due to his 3/$45 contract. Wild.

what are you even talking about, the team can't negotiate with the player but they can negotiate with the player's current team which...

Yes, teams famously don’t need players during free agency.

what are you even talking about, the team can't negotiate with the player but they can negotiate with the player's current team which...

This has positively nothing to do with his trade value. Your confusion is mounting.

it is because they needed him at that time and the other options were going to cost money and prospects.. Why you trade for a salary...

When you said he had negative trade value, I assumed you were saying he had negative trade value. My bad. Not sure how I mixed that up.

So you just don’t know what the word “negative” means. Got it.

So they are simultaneously willing to pay him that contract but also unwilling because…reasons. Got it. Makes total sense. Of course...

I think you guys are now trying to claim some sort of victory on the word negative... it is not that deep and you can clearly see that I...

Because the team has no negotiating power on a waiver deal. They may take a chance because they have the money. That doesn't mean they...

Lol claiming off waivers is exactly the same as paying them that contract as a FA…the refusal to admit that saying Murphy has negative...

Wait what? If you claim a guy off waivers you are exactly taking on that contract. Why would someone do that and not be willing to give...