nsacpi
Expects Yuge Games
same way we identify it with a system that requires id's
this year I voted in a state that requires id
my id was not checked
so much for a system that requires id's being foolproof
Last edited:
Race
- Thread starter 57Brave
- Start date
same way we identify it with a system that requires id's
this year I voted in a state that requires id
my id was not checked
so much for a system that requires id's being foolproof
cajunrevenge
Well-known member
Again, voting is a right, buying something from Walmart is not. Walmart can require you to hop on one leg while signing kumbaya to shop there if they want. But since when did Walmart require IDs to buy food?
sturg33
I
Rights have nothing to do with if something is racist.
cajunrevenge
Well-known member
It certainly does. If something is used to deny people of a specific race from their rights its racist. Also, when did Walmart start requiring ID?
nsacpi
Expects Yuge Games
i don't have to do it
in our system each party is highly motivated to detect and take action (within our legal system) against fraud that works against their interests
your boy brought dozens of lawsuits and got laughed out of court each time
Ah the argument that court cases were decided on the merits of the case. Cute argument.
You still have no clue how fraud could be identified and yet you claim it didn’t happen.
Sad
cajunrevenge
Well-known member
You have to have more than just accusations to get a case heard. Cases where they wanted voters disenfranchised because Trump didnt like something about how the election was run were never going to win, no court is going to disenfranchise voters because of something the voter couldnt control. Many of these cases were about things that Trump sued about before the election and loss. There was no point in hearing cases like that. In almost all cases Trumps argument was "well if you let us look we think we might find something". Thats not going to get a lawsuit to proceed, ever.
nsacpi
Expects Yuge Games
The system does have the ability to throw out elections marred by fraud. A congressional election in North Carolina had to be redone a few years ago. But there was actual for real evidence in that case. Sadly for very chosen one's acolytes there was no evidence of the same kind of fraud in 2020. Nor was there any in the races in Arizona in 2022 that the local denialists continue to refuse to concede. They've had their day in court. Many days in court. When you don't have evidence all you have left to do is whine and cry.
Yes aware of the fact that standing was used as an excuse to not investigate legitimate evidence of voter fraud.
You know how any audit is done in business world to identify material misstatements in financials.
sturg33
I
What is the racist part?
Describe actual evidence and how it can be obtained.
nsacpi
Expects Yuge Games
dude...you can use a search engine as well as anyone...look up the North Carolina case...also a more recent case in Bridgeport Connecticut...the system is capable of adjudicating actual for real instances of fraud...when yaknow this thang called evidence exists.
Oh the Bridgeport case with clear ballot dumping into drop boxes?
nsacpi
Expects Yuge Games
Article 1, Section 2: The House of Representatives shall be composed of Members chosen every second Year by the People of the several States.
15th Amendment: The right of citizens of the United States to vote shall not be denied or abridged by the United States or by any State on account of race, color, or previous condition of servitude.
19th Amendment: The right of citizens of the United States to vote shall not be denied or abridged by the United States or by any State on account of sex.
24th Amendment: The right of citizens of the United States to vote in any primary or other election for President or Vice President, for electors for President or Vice President, or for Senator or Representative in Congress, shall not be denied or abridged by the United States or any State by reason of failure to pay poll tax or other tax.
26th Amendment: The right of citizens of the United States, who are eighteen years of age or older, to vote shall not be denied or abridged by the United States or by any State on account of age.
Last edited:
Last edited:
zitothebrave
Connoisseur of Minors
Follow the checklist. It's right there.
though in modern prisons released felons probably should be allowed to vote since prisons basically are involuntary servitude.
Cool. So where does it explicitly say you have a right to vote?
You have a right to bear arms and free speech but what passage explicitly says you have a right to vote?
sturg33
I
Why are the leftists so stupid to understand that "rights" have nothing to do with a racism
A person has a right to call a black person the n word.. that's racist, but it is their right
Back to the topic... why is requiring an OD to vote, racist, bit requiring an ID to pick up groceries not racist?
A person has a right to call a black person the n word.. that's racist, but it is their right
Back to the topic... why is requiring an OD to vote, racist, bit requiring an ID to pick up groceries not racist?