2024 Field
- Thread starter Jaw
- Start date
cajunrevenge
Well-known member
cajunrevenge
Well-known member
That's not a defense that's propaganda. You can make all the false equivalencies you want but it doesn't exonerate one person because another wasn't prosecuted even if what you said was true. If Dema do it then prosecute them for it next time. I am begging your side to do it. Just don't cry about bias when you lose, you will lose that court case because what you say is false, not because of any bias or double standard.
Very easy solution - Commit to comprehensive audits that include existence testing and problem solved.
LOL! They aren't false equivalencies. No one was ever charged because it's not illegal. If it was don't you think the republicans would have pounced on the dems? You keep parroting stupid **** you hear from the media and corrupt prosecutors.
Now a few alternate electors may get nailed because of what was said on those legal forms they turned in but I'm not sure.
Republicans did this alternate electors thing just one time in recent memory then we hear stupid nonsense from idiots like you how this was a coup and corrupt dems try to prosecute people for it while at the same time whitewash the facts dems have done it many more times.
Now a few alternate electors may get nailed because of what was said on those legal forms they turned in but I'm not sure.
Republicans did this alternate electors thing just one time in recent memory then we hear stupid nonsense from idiots like you how this was a coup and corrupt dems try to prosecute people for it while at the same time whitewash the facts dems have done it many more times.
Last edited:
cajunrevenge
Well-known member
Theres a big difference between submitting elector forms to be used in the case of the winner being changed via court order and just submitting fake elector forms declaring they are the true electors. The ones that had the qualifier havent been charged. Eastmen even suggested they include that qualifier to protect themselves legally like the ones in PA did and was rejected. There have been faithless electors and there are laws against that varying by state with fines and jail time but its never been an issue because the losing candidate had already conceded and wasnt supporting it. Keep in mind there were 8 faithless electors of Hillarys electoral votes and only 2 of Trumps in 2016 and none of the 10 voted for the other candidate.
cajunrevenge
Well-known member
If thats what you want then you better vote for Dems because it will NEVER happen after a Republican wins. I guarantee you that.
Odd since the democrats fought audits (still do) every step of the way.
cajunrevenge
Well-known member
Has there been any Presidential election more audited and reviewed than the 2020 election? You have no evidence of anything worthwhile and just want to go on fishing expeditions that your side would never have supported when Trump won. So go cry me a river. Your side had the power to do it in 2017. Your side has the power to do it in several states they have overwhelming majorities in. All you are doing is just asking for more and more until someone tells you no, and then claiming thats what standing in your way of proving your narrative.
Dems keep preaching about supporting Ukraine being key to preventing a world war. Yet Biden last met with Putin 3 years ago. Are we even trying to negotiate an armistice? It certainly doesn't appear anything is happening on that front. But we'll keep that faucet to Ukraine just running wide open while we struggle to secure our borders.
cajunrevenge
Well-known member
Why would Putin negotiate now when theres a decent chance the winner of the 2024 election will give him anything he asks for. If Biden wins Putin knows he is in for at minimum another 4 years of bitter resistance and thats a point to negotiate with him, If Trump wins he "negotiates" with Putin by giving him everything he asks for.
That's cute.
What about the last 3 years?
Trump had no issues keeping Putin at bay his first time around.
If the SCOTUS doesn't take the immunity case Trump is back in the fryer in a biased DC court.
sturg33
I
Im still begging to know if the MAGA team has any sort of backup plan if Trump gets ****ed over
As far as I know there isn't any beyond hoping to get help from the appellate courts. They will overrule all of this nonsense but the appeals process take too much time and Trump might be in prison for awhile. The courts might allow him to be out of jail while the appeals go on but we can't count on that.
cajunrevenge
Well-known member
Putin attacking then would have been damaging to Trump. Rather than holding Putin at bay I think he was just gearing up to attack during Trumps second term where Trump would have been more free to act without fear of losing the next election. I think Trump would have withdrawn from NATO if he won which really opens up Putin to invade whoever he wanted. Putins stated goal is to ressurrect the USSR. He wants all the old territories back. Its not take some Ukranian territory and thats the end of it.
cajunrevenge
Well-known member
Trumps not going to prison before the election. At this point I kind of doubt any trial will even reach its conclusion before the election other than the NY Stormy Daniels case which I doubt he would get prison time for as a first offender and former President. Even in best case scenario a trial happens and he is convicted sentencing afterwards can be delayed for months and I would expect the courts to give a former President an appeal bond and delay sentencing until an appeal is finished. The only exception I think to that would be the obstruction charge on the documents case because courts generally do not take kindly to that kind of stuff but the Judge doing the sentencing was appointed by him and would probably care more about future promotions to higher courts. If she gives an unfavorable sentencing she will never be promoted by a future Republican President to a higher court.