The Border Deal

Union heads often don’t speak to their member concerns.

I’m admittedly uninformed to the border bill, so don’t need to go down that rabbit hole. But in this particular scenario, what incentive does a right leaning union have to misrepresent its members?
 
I’m admittedly uninformed to the border bill, so don’t need to go down that rabbit hole. But in this particular scenario, what incentive does a right leaning union have to misrepresent its members?

More often than not it’s money but it’s unknown in this case. From what I’ve read most rank and file hate the bill.
 
[tw]1754685312704393589[/tw]

This ain’t your daddy’s Republican Party.

Johnson saying this was done yesterday was a big driver in this.
 
Last edited:
emphatic!

GFlbXmlXoAAmtPk

Actually nevermind. Trump reassures us he did not, in fact, endorse Lankford.

[Tw]1754602682461892940[/tw]

And his cult nods approvingly. But I do wonder if they ever get insulted that their god is willing to lie to their face so frequently
 
It is noteworthy that the Border Patrol union (which endorsed very poorly chosen one in 2016 and 2020) thinks that the bill will improve the situation on the border. I'm not an expert. Just passing along what a pro-Trump union that actually has the job of patrolling the border thinks.

Basic improvements isn't the goal, especially if it's a temporary fix that will make things considerably worse in the future.

Using an oily towel to treat a gunshot wound would be better in the short term than nothing ,(which is the situation now). But it's going to lead to infection down the road when it is inevitably ignored. It's better to wait and think about a better solution than trying to attempt a terrible solution.
 
[tw]1755639356398751759[/tw]

And miraculously they will be able to manage the brorder better because flow will be diverted into concentrated areas of enforcement.
 
Back
Top