2024 Field

Carp said:
This ain't the guy to get behind. Despite what MSM says, it's perfectly fine not to buy into this new LGBTQ+ agenda. But it's quite another thing to openly attach the gay community and call them maggots and filth.
Click to expand...

I can support someone and not agree with everything they say.

The left is fine with doing this (Farakhan...etc...). Gender ideology is pure evil and should be taken out of society completely.
 
nsacpi said:
Outreach to people who don't fully agree with you is an important part of politics. Sometimes called building a coalition. We are gonna see how important in coming months.

President Biden: "Donald Trump made it clear he doesn't want Nikki Haley's supporters. I want to be clear: There is a place for them in my campaign. I know there is a lot we won't agree on. But on the fundamental issues of preserving American democracy, on standing up for the rule of law, on treating each other with decency and dignity and respect, on preserving NATO and standing up to America's adversaries, I hope and believe we can find common ground."
Click to expand...

Half of Haley voters were going to vote for Biden in the general even if Haley won....
 
thethe said:
I can support someone and not agree with everything they say.

The left is fine with doing this (Farakhan...etc...). Gender ideology is pure evil and should be taken out of society completely.
Click to expand...


When they are spewing hateful rhetoric, it's pretty important to stay away. There are better options. This is what gives us trash politicians like MTG.
 
[tw]1765417140121645318[/tw]

Of course BL thinks Biden's message makes sense.

Those PRIMARY voters were always going to be Biden voters regardless who won the R primary.
 
sturg33 said:
sounds like a great replacement theory conspiracy
Click to expand...

Not a replacement theory, the reality of a growing economy. You want the economy to shrink? The easiest way to do that is to decrease productivity which happens if you don't have the workforce needed to do the jobs.
 
zitothebrave said:
Not a replacement theory, the reality of a growing economy. You want the economy to shrink? The easiest way to do that is to decrease productivity which happens if you don't have the workforce needed to do the jobs.
Click to expand...

yes the leftist movement to discourage children in this country is a legit crisis.

replacing the culture with millions of people from third world countries is a legit crisis
 
sturg33 said:
yes the leftist movement to discourage children in this country is a legit crisis.

replacing the culture with millions of people from third world countries is a legit crisis
Click to expand...

It's something America has always done. The difference now is European countries don't have excess population to send over here they did in the 19th and early 20th century. Immigration has always been key to growth of the economy since the industrial revolution.

The options for growth now are Latin America and South East Asia. The former is much more likely to happen than the latter.

The estimated number of job growth needed to replace the retiring boomers is about 75M. That's a guesstimate but that's the number. The number of Citizen's 18-35 in the uS is about 74 Million. If half of them are women and they all have 2 kids sure you could have potentially replaced that but those population numbers haven't really existed for a long time.

Even with those, American citizens don't want their kids to be working a factory floor chopping up lettuce for Redipak. They don't want them wandering fields in california and florida picking fruits for minimum wage. They don't want them working McDonalds or BK. THat's not the american dream that they want to sell. It's something you can sell to immigrants who either want to

A. Make money in the US for a time period, send it home and live more comfortably in 10 years or so.
B. Want to make a life in America so their kids can have a better life.
 
Jobs are going to be replaced through automation - Brining in the third world is writing our own death sentence.
 
BTW thethe you don't have to answer. But I know you've said your dad was an immigrant, what country was he from and about when did he immigrate to the USA?
 
zitothebrave said:
BTW thethe you don't have to answer. But I know you've said your dad was an immigrant, what country was he from and about when did he immigrate to the USA?
Click to expand...

My father LEGALLY immigrated from Uruguay but his family was Eastern European (fled from Nazi's).

Next question?
 
thethe said:
My father LEGALLY immigrated from Uruguay but his family was Eastern European (fled from Nazi's).

Next question?
Click to expand...

I don't recall saying he legally or illegally did anything.

My point is that to many people Eastern Europe would be third world especially back in the day, Uruguay would be 3rd world etc. Even though technically what made you third world was not being aligned with Nato or the USSR/China (aka 1st world is the "west" you vilify now, 2nd world being eastern europe, South East Asia, etc. 3rd world being Mexico, India, most of Africa that wasn't a colony, parts of oceania and the caribbean, etc. technically in 1975, Sweden, Ireland, Switzerland, Austria, and Finland would fall in the that.

Using the modern non-cold war third world. Developing vs. Developed, Eastern Europe and Uruguay are both developing countries.

Me i'm a person who wants legal immigration, undocumented workers are exploited workers who often will lead to other issues. The issue is now legal immigration is so tightass and hard. And it benefits the capitalists. It's easy for someone to buy a bunch of **** drive by home depot tell a handful of illegals to jump in and go do a job. Those people have no protectiosn and are paid a fraction of their worth.
 
how bout that

GIBBtPIWAAAf3ia
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top