Trump Indictment Watch

Garmel said:
Nope, just stating fact.

When people like Jeb Bush who doesn't like Trump is saying the same thing I am that should say something.

Nearly every legal scholar who isn't a left wing extremist says the same thing I'm saying.

You MSM know-nothings continually have your head in the sand. I should say "ass" but that would be impolite.
Click to expand...


Jeb Bush lol. This shows how you people rig every argument in your own minds. Anyone who disagrees with you or Trump is biased against him. Trump immediately starts talking **** about them then when they clap back you say thats proof of how biased there are against Trump. People support Trump for years then as soon as they come out against him on just one thing they are a Trump hater. Liz Cheney, Mike Pence, Bill Barr, etc. You do the same with law scholars. No law scholars disagree with you except the extreme left win ones and you define them as extreme left wing simply for disagreeing with you. Thus its true in your mind.
 
https://www.forbes.com/sites/alison...nes-were-paid-in-these-cases/?sh=4ebe81cc3172



For those saying the surety bond is impossible to pay. Heres a list of bigger surety bonds companies have paid out. Cox Communication 1.2 billion bond. Samsung 1 billion bond. SAP 1.3 billion bond. Marvel Technology 1.5 billion bond. The issue is that Trump to too broke and toxic for anyone to want to do business with him. Lying to your loan company about your wealth tends to make companies not want to loan you money.
 
Nope. Keep trying. The answer is in the story.

You still can't figure out why I give you "LOLs" all of the time.

Btw, there was no conviction

It's pretty funny that one of the the "victims" testified for Trump.

The lender and the borrower negotiated for a price that was beneficial to both sides. That's how capitalism works. That's why this will be thrown out in one of the appellates.
 
How about they are credible companies not known for not paying their bills?



And there was no conviction? Trump will be glad to hear it. I guess nothing will happen on Monday since he doesnt have to post a bond to appeal since theres no conviction.


And I know why you gaslight, because you got nothing else.
 
Last edited:
cajunrevenge said:
How about they are credible companies not known for not paying their bills?



And there was no conviction? Trump will be glad to hear it. I guess nothing will happen on Monday since he doesnt have to post a bond to appeal since theres no conviction.


And I know why you gaslight, because you got nothing else.
Click to expand...

You don't have convictions in a civil trial, dummy.

Why do you talk out of your ass constantly?
 
No guilt, just liability in a civil trial. Perhaps don't try to be a dick over semantics and I won't either. I'll be the first to admit I sometimes do that too.
 
Trump pulled a nice little trick that got his upcoming fraud trial delayed a few weeks. He waited until January to subpoena the federal SDNY for documents then when he got them a week ago tried to get his case delayed or dismissed for DA Alvin Bragg not providing him with discovery documents that he didnt have and didnt have any power to compel the SDNY to turn them over to Trump. Alvin Bragg agreed to a short delay but thats all Trump got out of it. So trial will start sometime in April.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top