What’s the 2000’s version of ‘The Godfather’

LOTR is a fairly niche fanbase. I mean it's got a huge following, but it's more akin to Star Wars than something like The Godfather.

The 3 films had a 3 billion dollar box office. The hobbit trilogy also pulled nearly 3 billion. Wouldn't call it a niche fanbase.

Godfather is not as big as you make it out to be it's gotten legendary status more than it being a truly hugely watched film.
 
LOTR is a fairly niche fanbase. I mean it's got a huge following, but it's more akin to Star Wars than something like The Godfather.

I see what you’re saying. I wouldn’t call it niche but I agree LOTR is under-appreciated because it’s a genre film with big budget special effects. There’s a tendency to withhold the prestige label though I think this is bias has diminished quite a bit in recent years. I think there’s a good chance is the movie this trilogy is what is remembered most from this era.
 
I see what you’re saying. I wouldn’t call it niche but I agree LOTR is under-appreciated because it’s a genre film with big budget special effects. There’s a tendency to withhold the prestige label though I think this is bias has diminished quite a bit in recent years. I think there’s a good chance is the movie this trilogy is what is remembered most from this era.

It's also acted the **** out. Viggo Mortensen is an all-timer. He didn't get the respect he deserved then and I still think he's underappreciated, got to be in the top x percent of actors who've never won an academy award.
 
It's also acted the **** out. Viggo Mortensen is an all-timer. He didn't get the respect he deserved then and I still think he's underappreciated, got to be in the top x percent of actors who've never won an academy award.

Indeed. Criminally underrated
 
The 3 films had a 3 billion dollar box office. The hobbit trilogy also pulled nearly 3 billion. Wouldn't call it a niche fanbase.

Godfather is not as big as you make it out to be it's gotten legendary status more than it being a truly hugely watched film.

Avengers franchise made billions in the box office too. Is that the criteria we're basing this on now?

I like LOTR a lot. But it's niche. It's a fantasy film with elves and dwarves and dragons.
 
Avengers franchise made billions in the box office too. Is that the criteria we're basing this on now?

I like LOTR a lot. But it's niche. It's a fantasy film with elves and dwarves and dragons.

And a mob movie set in NYC/NJ isn't niche either? Every film has a level of nicheness to it.
 
the Godfather is one of the most watched and most respected movies of all time.


IMDB has it number #2
Rotten tomatoes has it #2
Variety has it #3
 
Avengers franchise made billions in the box office too. Is that the criteria we're basing this on now?

I like LOTR a lot. But it's niche. It's a fantasy film with elves and dwarves and dragons.

Return of the King is tied for the most Academy Awards won by a movie with 11. It wasn't just a commercial success, it was a critical success too.

If you call The Lord of the Rings a niche, genre film because it's fantasy then you'd have to call The Godfather a niche, gangster film. Sometimes films transcend their genres. That was the case with both LOTR and The Godfather.
 
If LOTR is a niche movie then Game of Thrones is a niche TV show. Forget its 59 Emmy awards and the fact that it was arguably the most acclaimed and talked about show on TV when it was on.

Genre doesn't matter. A great movie will be a great movie no matter what genre it comes from. The idea that certain genres are niche or incapable of producing something great is just wrong.

Jaws is ultimately a creature flick.
The Dark Knight is a comic book movie.
The Good, The Bad, and The Ugly is a western.
Interstellar is a sci-fi movie.
It's a Wonderful Life is a Christmas movie.
Saving Private Ryan is a war movie.

Each of these genres could be considered niche but that didn't stop great movies from coming out of them.
 
Return of the King is tied for the most Academy Awards won by a movie with 11. It wasn't just a commercial success, it was a critical success too.

If you call The Lord of the Rings a niche, genre film because it's fantasy then you'd have to call The Godfather a niche, gangster film. Sometimes films transcend their genres. That was the case with both LOTR and The Godfather.



Feel the same way about The Dark Knight. It’s a great stand alone film that transcends being just another superhero film.
 
Not really, no.

It's certainly far less niche than a fantasy movie about dragons and wizards and elves.

What Dragon was in Lord of the Rings? Elves and WIzards were mostly washed over. The film is a film at it's core. A hardcore Tolkienfan would deride the film for it not staying true to the books.

You're right it's fantasy, but of it's era, fantasy films were quite popular, Harry Potter, Hunger Games (guess that may be more sci-fi) Twilight, Avatar, Pirates of the Caribbean, etc,

Top 10 global box office biggest films of the 00 decade were basically all live action fantasy except for the Dark Knight and Shrek 2, which shrek is animated fantasy.

If I had to explain to someone with no knowledge the 2 films, do you think they'd struggle? No. Because they're at their core thematic films. Lord of the Rings is a simple good vs. evil with a strong core of characters. Godfather is a movie about family with a strong core of characters.
 
What Dragon was in Lord of the Rings? Elves and WIzards were mostly washed over. The film is a film at it's core. A hardcore Tolkienfan would deride the film for it not staying true to the books.

You're right it's fantasy, but of it's era, fantasy films were quite popular, Harry Potter, Hunger Games (guess that may be more sci-fi) Twilight, Avatar, Pirates of the Caribbean, etc,

Top 10 global box office biggest films of the 00 decade were basically all live action fantasy except for the Dark Knight and Shrek 2, which shrek is animated fantasy.

If I had to explain to someone with no knowledge the 2 films, do you think they'd struggle? No. Because they're at their core thematic films. Lord of the Rings is a simple good vs. evil with a strong core of characters. Godfather is a movie about family with a strong core of characters.

Fellbeast is basically a dragon
 
What Dragon was in Lord of the Rings? Elves and WIzards were mostly washed over. The film is a film at it's core. A hardcore Tolkienfan would deride the film for it not staying true to the books.

You're right it's fantasy, but of it's era, fantasy films were quite popular, Harry Potter, Hunger Games (guess that may be more sci-fi) Twilight, Avatar, Pirates of the Caribbean, etc,

Top 10 global box office biggest films of the 00 decade were basically all live action fantasy except for the Dark Knight and Shrek 2, which shrek is animated fantasy.

If I had to explain to someone with no knowledge the 2 films, do you think they'd struggle? No. Because they're at their core thematic films. Lord of the Rings is a simple good vs. evil with a strong core of characters. Godfather is a movie about family with a strong core of characters.

Jesus Christ are you that much of a ****ing nerd?

lotr3_movie_screencaps.com_19770.jpg



This ^ is, for all intents and purposes, a fuggin dragon to 95% of the movie viewing world. I don't care if it's technically not a dragon. Although technically it also isn't not a dragon, as to my limited knowledge their origins aren't super touched on,. But I am not a Tolkien nerd, so maybe I'm wrong. Google suggests no none else knows exactly what they are either.

You also ignore the fact that it takes place in a fantasy world where dragons are indeed real.
 
Last edited:
Jesus Christ are you that much of a ****ing nerd?

lotr3_movie_screencaps.com_19770.jpg



This ^ is, for all intents and purposes, a fuggin dragon to 95% of the movie viewing world. I don't care if it's technically not a dragon. Although technically it also isn't not a dragon, as to my limited knowledge their origins aren't super touched on,. But I am not a Tolkien nerd, so maybe I'm wrong. Google suggests no none else knows exactly what they are either.

You also ignore the fact that it takes place in a fantasy world where dragons are indeed real.

That's not a dragon it would be a Wyvern. Dragons have 4 legs/limbs and seperate wings, wyverns have 2 legs and wings with claws.

But yeah fell beasts have a bit of murkiness (Tolkien IIRC famously said he liked to leave some things a mystery even to himself, like Tom Bombadil, the Entwives, etc.)

But they're not Dragon's at all in Tolkien Universe because LEgolas killed a fell beast with an arrow at range. To kill Smaug a dragon they had to thread the needle with a shot into a gap in his scales. Fell beasts don't have scales.

Really they're dinosaurs. Bred to be mounts for the Nazgul. Tolkien himself says they're supposed to resemble a Pterosaur.
 
I really hope if that's the case they simplify the names. I have played 200 hours in that game and I mean Marika, Melina, Miquella, Melenia, Maliketh, Margit, Morgott, Milicent, Mohg, Godefroy, Godfrey, Godrick, Godwyn, Rellana, Rennala, Rodrick, Rickard, Radagon, Ranni. Like I legit forget who's who all the time. Like just pick a few of the Demigods and go with different names.

Yeah agreed. It’s very reminiscent of GRRM’s other work (good luck trying to keep track of those Targaryeans). From Software is also notoriously obtuse with its storytelling which doesn’t help either. There’s a not so small cottage industry on YouTube of Soulsbourne YouTubers who get a lot of mileage mining Souls lore.
 
Back
Top