sturg33
I
Trump has pretty consistently historically against wars.
Back when you were a free thinking libertarian you agreed with him
TLHLIM
- Thread starter sturg33
- Start date
Trump has pretty consistently historically against wars.
Back when you were a free thinking libertarian you agreed with him
cajunrevenge
Well-known member
He is pretty consistently whatever he thinks works best for him at the time. Let me remind you when given a choice between Mitt Romney and Ron Paul he chose Mitt Romney. Because he goes whatever way he thinks the wind is blowing. If he thought open borders and free healthcare would get him more power he would do it. Because he is not in any way shape or form a man of principle.
sturg33
I
So going agianst ukraine makes him more popular with americans?
cajunrevenge
Well-known member
Trump knows supporting Ukraine is popular because he obsesses over polls. That's why he has continually sent aid to Ukraine despite his base hating it. Thus why he needed an excuse to blame Zelensky and we got that set up at the White House.
It's really just semantics they are playing. Putins ready for peace talks because he won't be asked to make any concessions. That's not peace it's a surrender. So yeah Putins ready for Ukraine to surrender. Zelensky changed it up and said he is ready for peace too but his stance never really changed. There can only be peace when Russia ends the occupation of Ukraine and only Putin has the power to do that.
cajunrevenge
Well-known member
Yes I have eyes and ears. He is very transparent if you just listen to what he says. Weren't you one of the people mocking me for saying Trump wasnt going to accept his L in 2020 and try to stay in office. How did I know that? Because he flat out told us long before hand. His literal strategy of trying to get states legislatures to overturn results was leaked in February 2020. Which they denied then did exactly what the leak said 10 months later.
Can’t see the tweets and surely it’s something I disagree on, but as a general point **** Gavin Newsom, regardless of any of his thoughts on certain topics. Newsom is just a politician in the worst possible sense. He will do whatever he thinks will give him a chance at the Presidency.
I happen to like that he gave Charlie Kirk a platform to chat with him, and I think more discussions need to be started. When you let Newsmax or Fox News entirely control the narrative about what it means to be a progressive for millions of people because you refuse to talk to people you disagree with, you concede that entire population. How many people do we think heard the Press Secretary say tariffs are a tax cut and believe that unflinchingly? Dems can reach those voters if they can be brave enough to talk to people they disagree with, even on fundamental levels.
But he ****ing sucks. Like just the fakest possible human.
zbhargrove
Well-known member
That's pretty disgusting
Tapate50
Well-known member
Imagine taking out your angst against a car.
What a bunch of crybaby losers.
Who was it that BL was constantly telling us would roll over in his grave about the GOP being crybabies?
My how the times have changed.
sturg33
I
BL isn't around to comment.
Oh wait actually he felt the need to start a thread whining about Elon