TLHLIM

OH NO HE COULDN"T COMPLETE THE RAPE!

He's actually a good person!
Nobody here is saying this, nor is anybody even defending his actions. But you must see how it’s perhaps misleading to use the word rape to go after a judge given that you are claiming he didn’t commit rape in this very post.
 
Nobody here is saying this, nor is anybody even defending his actions. But you must see how it’s perhaps misleading to use the word rape to go after a judge given that you are claiming he didn’t commit rape in this very post.
This guy is a rapist doing this to a child.
 
You came here to defend the criminal and explain hos community service was an adequate punishment

All yall do is stay silent or play defense
Did I ever say that? Here's a hint, nope I said

"Basically the judge said that the community could police him."

Which I mean if you read the article you'd come to the same conclusion instead of you just screening twitter.
 
Literally nothing from yall.

You believe in nothing. Just whatever youre told
I'm pretty sure I've vocally said that people shouldn't be allowed gender reaffirming surgery until adulthood. I also feel the same way about anything life time, marriage, tattoos, etc.. You can feel free to correct me. You're trying to start an argument with people that don't hold that point.
 
You’re exhausting.
How predictable.

You and I have debated this topic for years. You firmly supported irreversible life changing surgeries for children. You said you would do it to your own kid if needed. You said the science backed this up

Now the science is starting to change its tune. They are losing lawsuits and major medical associations are saying "actually, we should not be doing this to kids."

And you have nothing to say. Aren't you outraged? The scientific community is turning its back on kids, damnit! Tell me why they are wrong, if you still think they are wrong.

Silence is easier than defending the indefensible though
 
I'm pretty sure I've vocally said that people shouldn't be allowed gender reaffirming surgery until adulthood. I also feel the same way about anything life time, marriage, tattoos, etc.. You can feel free to correct me. You're trying to start an argument with people that don't hold that point.
If you have the post to show you've said this, please share. But since you are 100% lock step with the hive mind at all times. I have my doubts.

What's gonna happen here is what always happens. We saw it with covid, we saw it with GA JIM CROW! We see it all the time.

Over time the mainstream will shift on this topic and admit it's bad. Giving y'all permission to admit it's bad. It'll look something like this

"I was always uneasy about the mutilating kids, and certainly it seems to have gone too far and I'm glad we are correcting that."
 
How predictable.

You and I have debated this topic for years. You firmly supported irreversible life changing surgeries for children. You said you would do it to your own kid if needed. You said the science backed this up

Now the science is starting to change its tune. They are losing lawsuits and major medical associations are saying "actually, we should not be doing this to kids."

And you have nothing to say. Aren't you outraged? The scientific community is turning its back on kids, damnit! Tell me why they are wrong, if you still think they are wrong.

Silence is easier than defending the indefensible though

I’ve said from the start that I will accept the guidance of medical professionals on the subject. If they change the guidance, they change the guidance. I’m not outraged by other science or medicine that changes over time, and I’m not outraged by this. No harm has ever come to me or my family as a result of the old guidance, and I suspect no harm will come to my family based on any changes to it.
 
I’ve said from the start that I will accept the guidance of medical professionals on the subject. If they change the guidance, they change the guidance. I’m not outraged by other science or medicine that changes over time, and I’m not outraged by this. No harm has ever come to me or my family as a result of the old guidance, and I suspect no harm will come to my family based on any changes to it.
LOL

"I will believe whatever the mainstream says to believe at any given time... also too bad about all those kids who got mutilated. Oh well"
 
LOL

"I will believe whatever the mainstream says to believe at any given time... also too bad about all those kids who got mutilated. Oh well"
I’ll generally believe the consensus of the medical community on issues that don’t pertain to me. Turns out I don’t have the resources to do my own studies on this, and the studies and evidence I’ve seen have suggested that most patients were happy with their decisions. If it affected me or my family personally I’d certainly look further into it, but I have no cause to do so, just like I have no reason to question chemotherapy or other medical treatments.

Should I simply trust you on these matters instead?
 
You guys like to pretend that I’m being a sheep for following one thing but genuinely what is the alternative to me accepting what is told to me when I cannot experience it for myself or do my own research?
 
Need a doctor to tell you that mutilating children is bad? That says something about you
There are other instances in which a doctor must “mutilate” a patient and it’s not questioned at all. I don’t required informed consent on somebody else’s medical treatment.
 
Back
Top