Profar 162 game suspension.

CyYoung31 said:
We ain’t paying him 17 million to play for another team, I can promise you that.

The better question is can he do anything to redeem himself in the eyes of the clubhouse. I’m not sure he can after not only breaking their trust a 2nd time in a year, but also refusing to own it and face them.

But, he’s either playing for the Braves or he’s playing for no one next year.
Click to expand...
When you think about it though, we'd really just be paying him the money we were going to pay him this year. We all know AA isn't going to spend it elsewhere.
 
mfree80 said:
My guess is that they will agree to a buyout of the last year, spreading the cost over a number of years.
Click to expand...
I'm fine with having 17 years of Jurickson Profar Day to remind the organization to never sign a guy who sucked most of his career and then all of a sudden started hitting the ball significantly harder.
 
CyYoung31 said:
We ain’t paying him 17 million to play for another team, I can promise you that.

The better question is can he do anything to redeem himself in the eyes of the clubhouse. I’m not sure he can after not only breaking their trust a 2nd time in a year, but also refusing to own it and face them.

But, he’s either playing for the Braves or he’s playing for no one next year.
Click to expand...
Yes I get that. I still don’t think he will ever play another game as a Brave…
 
I dont understand how theres not language in thr contract that allows them to void it in these situations. It would atleast be nice to know they are going to add it to future contracts. If the player balks at the provision then that should tell our geniuses running the team
 
That’s fucking stupid. Gonna sit on their hands for several weeks for a formality. If there was anything working for Profar to get it overturned, the Braves would be defending him. Something somewhere would have leaked by now. It’s just another excuse for being cheap asses and likely ducking.
 
cajunrevenge said:
I dont understand how theres not language in thr contract that allows them to void it in these situations. It would atleast be nice to know they are going to add it to future contracts. If the player balks at the provision then that should tell our geniuses running the team
Click to expand...
I think the player association is pretty much against any language that allows a contract to be voided. why they are all guaranteed.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top