Ferguson....

I said it may not have happened, if you read the next sentence or 2 you would have seen why I said that may not have happened. you know you have good odds of if you punch someone in the face of injuring your hand right? I'm not saying he did or didn't, but we don't know if he didn't shoot Brown from behind either. WE make an assumption based on what we perceive the facts to be.

How would the officer have a fractured orbital bone if not punched?
 
You're assuming that he didn't already call for back up. Did he? Can you say he did or did not?

Have you read a report that he had? I haven't. You'd think that would have come out by now. I could be wrong of course, but I'm guessing in the 5 seconds or so the kid ran away he didn't radio for backup, get out of his car and then train his weapon on the kid. The latter 2 parts alone probably took the time it took for the kid to get 35+ feet away.
 
Right, so if someone got punched in the face and had his eye socket busted, calling for backup woudl not be an appropriate action?

A) You have no idea if he could have called for backup
B) You have no idea if he did call for backup
C) You have no idea how long it would have taken for his backup to arrive

How do you call for backup if you are being attacked?
 
Holy ****



Damn Zito. I like you. Please quit. It's physically impossible that Brown got shot in his back.
 
Holy ****

Damn Zito. I like you. Please quit. It's physically impossible that Brown got shot in his back.

According to Zito Brown got shot in his back (autopsy disagrees), the cop punched himself in the face (eyewitnesses disagree), and if cops come to your neighborhood, you should riot.
 
According to Zito Brown got shot in his back (autopsy disagrees), the cop punched himself in the face (eyewitnesses disagree), and if cops come to your neighborhood, you should riot.

Its a damn show with him. Eventually he is going to delete all his posts like he did in the Israel thread.
 
Have you read a report that he had? I haven't. You'd think that would have come out by now. I could be wrong of course, but I'm guessing in the 5 seconds or so the kid ran away he didn't radio for backup, get out of his car and then train his weapon on the kid. The latter 2 parts alone probably took the time it took for the kid to get 35+ feet away.

Cops don't have to call for back up. Thier little Walkie talkie they wear has a button that initiates a live feed of what they are doing if they are in trouble so every other cop can hear it. I imagine he did that. Takes a second

Didn't another cop show up and witness the shooting? So somehow that cop knew
 
Its a damn show with him. Eventually he is going to delete all his posts like he did in the Israel thread.

No I deleted the Israel thread because people took it off the track of my discussion, not for any other reason. You guys are the ones who've made up your minds without knowing the facts. It's sad really.
 
No I deleted the Israel thread because people took it off the track of my discussion, not for any other reason. You guys are the ones who've made up your minds without knowing the facts. It's sad really.

No, I've made up my mind because ALL the evidence that has come out has shown this kid was a loose cannon and was NOT shot in the back.
 
Cops don't have to call for back up. Thier little Walkie talkie they wear has a button that initiates a live feed of what they are doing if they are in trouble so every other cop can hear it. I imagine he did that. Takes a second

Didn't another cop show up and witness the shooting? So somehow that cop knew

Maybe he did do that. IIRC the other cop was also showing up to the robbery report, but I may be wrong on that.
 
Im not sure what Zito's goal of this whole exercise; maybe bored and just trolling. But, it has helped me understand that there are people out there dumb enough to go out and riot/loot for no reason. At least he has accomplished something.
 
No, I've made up my mind because ALL the evidence that has come out has shown this kid was a loose cannon and was NOT shot in the back.

AA, said the same **** about how thethe, Giles and my mind are already made up. That could be that we were correct from day one and have nothing to question.
 
Do you realize that the area of the front of the body that is exposed in this EXAGGERATED movement you propose is very small right?

And bullets are pretty small to. ANd cops usually are pretty decent shots. The point is that it can happen that way. You said above he was NOT shot in the back. True he wasn't shot in his actual section of the body that was his back, but if he was shot in his arm it's easy to see how an eyewitness can miss that. But cannot say with 100% certainly that he was not shot from behind. Because you have no evidence to back that up yet. That evidence may exist but it's not available to you and I.
 
So shooting him six times was "trying to arrest him"? Maybe you are a cop.

Did you see the video where the witness said that Brown kept charging as he was getting shot and that he believed Brown must have been on something? (which is the same version from the cops friend) I believe they have said 4 of the shots were in the arm, correct? He has every right to use deadly force when his life is threatened. Hopefully, better means are developed so that isn't the case in the future, but the bottom line was Brown was at fault. No one can blame anyone but him.

What threat to society could Brown have caused in the future, particularly if he was able to wrestle the gun away from the cop?
 
Back
Top