Not sure what's funny about it. Evidence differs as to Brown's exact actions in this ordeal, but we know Wilson shot an unarmed man from a considerable distance—an act exhibiting an unholy mix of cowardice and thuggery.
What distance was it?
Not sure what's funny about it. Evidence differs as to Brown's exact actions in this ordeal, but we know Wilson shot an unarmed man from a considerable distance—an act exhibiting an unholy mix of cowardice and thuggery.
Not sure what's funny about it. Evidence differs as to Brown's exact actions in this ordeal, but we know Wilson shot an unarmed man from a considerable distance—an act exhibiting an unholy mix of cowardice and thuggery.
Well considering I entirely disagree with you about the evidentiary merits of this case, and personally think Wilson committed a crime: yes.
And self-defense.
What distance was it?
Well, darn, wish you were on the grand jury to be one of 12 then.
From everything I've read, about one-hundred-and-fifty feet from Wilson's vehicle and about forty feet from Wilson himself.
Wilson didn't have a whole lot of options to choose from to stop a 300 pound person charging at him.
![]()
...
He'd already shot Brown from forty feet. He thus certainly had the option of not shooting him eleven more times.
Correct me if I'm wrong, but 2 of the shots were in the car when Brown was grabbing for the gun. He was then shot 4 times as he was charging toward Wilson.
Based on the evidence provided to the grand jury, he continued his charge toward the officer as he was getting shot.
Who wouldn't be in fear of their life with a 300 pound person grabbing for your gun or charging at you? This might be the worst defense of brown I've hear. The officer shouldn't defend himself?
I may have misread, "total during altercation" for "total after Brown fled the initial altercation", but that's nonetheless nine more shots than Wilson needed to fire even if Brown were "charging".
It's unclear whether he was "charging" or simply falling.
I hold police to a much higher standard than civilians—they should be held to a much higher standard, as they choose to become servers and protectors entrusted with the state's monopoly on force, lethal and otherwise (though they sadly seem to ever-more-rarely opt for "otherwise" in recent times)—so yes: the officer shouldn't have "defended himself" with lethal force even if a three-hundred-pound man was running him. There are alternatives, but for a lot of massively ****ed up and unjust reasons—not all of which are directly the fault of Darren Wilson, mind you—the officer did not avail himself of those alternatives.
You guys are unreal.
the officer shouldn't have "defended himself" with lethal force [even if a three-hundred-pound man was running him. There are alternatives....the officer did not avail himself of those alternatives.