Varvaro traded to Red Sox for RHP Kurcz

And what if he's Dan Kolb part 2?

Will the controllable assets you get from 2 months of Johnson (assuming he's fixed) be better than Valvaro?

If the team projects to win 70-ish games, what in the hell difference does it make???
 
Do you think the Braves will get anything of significance for Jim Johnson? You just saw the market for an at worse equal reliever, that is younger with cheap, cost controlled salary.

I don't know. It might not work out at all, but it's hardly a risk to sign him and the pay off could be a piece. It's essentially a round about way to buy a mid level prospect.
 
This is exactly the type of return I was expecting for Varvaro in a trade. A minor league reliever with some potential that doesn't need adding to our 40-man roster.
 
So the hope is Roger can transform Johnson into.....what Varvaro is?

Johnson has a better track record and if he gets back to what he was, he is worth substantially more than Vavaro at the deadline. Teams that need an actual closer might actually give us an actual prospect for Johnson. This is pretty much the best return we could hope for Vavaro at basically any stage of his career.
 
And what if he's Dan Kolb part 2?

Will the controllable assets you get from 2 months of Johnson (assuming he's fixed) be better than Valvaro?

It's a minimal risk, and if doesn't work out, we're are none the worse off. If it does work out, then we have the best closer option on the market come trade deadline. Teams will pay a premium for good closers at the deadline. Not so much for middle relievers with no history of closing.
 
Indeed, why is Russell still on the team if we don't care?

Assuming Justin and/or Gattis are traded at some point (whether that's in the near future or before the deadline) I'd certainly expect Russell and the others will be moved if they can bring back a useful piece.

It appears they're not going to "wave the white flag" on 2015 until they see if they can get the pieces they want in return for Justin and/or Evan. This is what every member of the front office and Gonzalez have said in every interview I've seen, heard, or read all winter. This has been the company line since the day Hart accepted the job - that they were willing to listen and if they didn't like what they heard they'd proceed from there.
 
Before I go off on a tangent, I will try to get some reasoning.

We sign Jim Johnson for 1.6 million and trade the superior reliever in Varvaro (cheap and under control for 4 years). Varvaro is a legitimate 7th inning guy and we trade him for possibly a 7th inning guy

I need some type of logic

And they give the Cards Walden on top of Heyward when the return sucked.

I was more upset we traded Walden than Heyward, well not really but they didnt need to give them both.
 
Giles is right.

Varvaro is a very solid 5th-6th RP, maybe 4th.

He had a sub-3 ERA last year and is under control for 4 more years, and they give him away for some smuck. Makes no sense, nor does anything they're doing right now.
 
When you consider what the Braves were trading, a player they had just DFA'd, the return wasn't so bad.

It is definitely worth discussing whether or not Varvaro should have been DFA'd in the first place. Personally I've never been impressed with him, but there are a few others still holding roster spots that have impressed me even less (I'm looking at you, Constanza). The only disadvantage to keeping Varvaro, absent a CJ-like turnaround in his performance, is that he hurts roster flexibility.
 
I wish I could remember if the same guys who are crapping their pants over our trading Varvaro were crapping their pants in the game threads every time we put him in a close game.
 
When you consider what the Braves were trading, a player they had just DFA'd, the return wasn't so bad.

It is definitely worth discussing whether or not Varvaro should have been DFA'd in the first place. Personally I've never been impressed with him, but there are a few others still holding roster spots that have impressed me even less (I'm looking at you, Constanza). The only disadvantage to keeping Varvaro, absent a CJ-like turnaround in his performance, is that he hurts roster flexibility.

Bowman reported that Varvaro was being discussed in trade talks back during the winter meetings. So it shouldn't be a big surprise that he was traded. The DFA didn't really effect the deal at all since this was a deal agreed to prior to it. It just didn't go official till after we DFA'd him, that is my take anyway based on how everything was reported, etc.

Further, I think it is safe to say that Constanza will be one of the next to go. I'd also look for Jaime to go and a trade involving Pastornicky to come before the end of spring training too. Pastornicky, like Varvaro and Constanza, is out of options. So if he isn't going to be on our roster it makes sense to move him now. He was also mentioned in trade talks according to Bowman at the winter meetings.
 
I wish I could remember if the same guys who are crapping their pants over our trading Varvaro were crapping their pants in the game threads every time we put him in a close game.

Probably the same guys who were incensed that the Braves Joey Nation a few years back.... (Who?)
 
This has Fredi written all over it. He never liked/trusted Varvaro and now he has a say regarding the roster. I'm thinking the most magical thing about the Magical 2017 Hart keeps talking about is that it will actually happen three years in the future. 2020.

magic.gif
 
This has Fredi written all over it. He never liked/trusted Varvaro and now he has a say regarding the roster. I'm thinking the most magical thing about the Magical 2017 Hart keeps talking about is that it will actually happen three years in the future. 2020.

magic.gif

Well, Fredi didn't like Gearrin either unless you count abusing him by making him a pitch a whole month without a day off (which like nsacpi I'd argue led to him going from good-to-ineffective to injured a la Venters, etc). Further, Gearrin also got DFA'd and then released and since signed with the Giants. Bochy will use him right if he makes it back after Tommy John. What a night and day difference that could be for his career too.
 
Well, Fredi didn't like Gearrin either outside of abusing him by making him a pitch a whole month without a day off (which like nsacpi I'd argue led to him going from good-to-ineffective to injured a la Venters, etc). Further, Gearrin also got DFA'd and then released and since signed with the Giants. Bochy will use him right if he makes it back after Tommy John. What a night and day difference that could be for his career too.

Yep. I guess in three or four years the team will fire Fredi and then talk about how ****ty he was as a manager and terrible in the clubhouse and how he ruined the Mukaki Rebuild and no one liked him.
 
Back
Top