This isn't even the least bit true.
Then you need to watch Harden play more and slow motion a lot of his drives.
This isn't even the least bit true.
Nobody has ever said what he is doing is against the rules.
But that statement basically backs up what I'm saying. Harden is aware that contact on the arms is going to draw a foul regardless of who initiates it. He has found a loophole and smartly is taking advantage of it.
Its not a loophole. He gets legitimately fouled. Its the defenders obligation not to foul.
So you are ok with rip moves and kicking your legs out on three pointers?
The RIP move is legitimate. Play defense, it's your fault your arm gets caught.
I rarely see players kick their legs out in an effort to get fouled.
The RIP move is legitimate. Play defense, it's your fault your arm gets caught.
I rarely see players kick their legs out in an effort to get fouled.
It's basically just Jamal Crawford.
I disagree with this. The point of a foul is to ensure that you aren't impeding a player from performing a basketball move. These plays are not basketball moves. They are moves to draw fouls and should be removed from the game.
The obligation is not on the offensive player to keep the defender from fouling him.
So which stipulation do you believe justifies Hardens tactic?
They aren't trying to block him from moving. They are running side by side and Harden throws his hands up into the defenders hands.
So you don't watch, but you think the game is fixed?