zitothebrave
Connoisseur of Minors
It does but he's not even close to that player now, it's not like his numbers are down slightly....he went from a 157 to a sub 100 guy.
OK and that refutes my point how?
It does but he's not even close to that player now, it's not like his numbers are down slightly....he went from a 157 to a sub 100 guy.
OK and that refutes my point how?
He's not good anymore.......
So for 3 years he was about a 2 fWAR player per year and was hurt, and he's not good anymore? At 25? You sound like thethe.
This debate sounds familiar...
So for 3 years he was about a 2 fWAR player per year and was hurt, and he's not good anymore? At 25? You sound like thethe.
He's not even remotely close to the same player.....
he's down 40-50 points in average
his OBP went from 370 to 320 - 315 - 301 - 303
his ISO went from 287 to 132 - 142 - 174 - 083
Whether his rookie year was a fluke or all the injuries changed him, he's not close to the same guy and he's not good anymore. Maybe it will change but so far the results in Oakland have been worse. His BABIP is 50-70 points over his norm, so his numbers are going to get even worse.
Again, he's helped that he's above average in the field but he blows at the plate.
It was acknowledged that he's good defensively. His bat has pretty much stunk since his rookie year. Therefore his bat stinks.
Lawrie was never good outside of the minors
Again, the point I'm contesting is
No one cares about that point, everyone knows he was a stud his rookie year. He sucks now
Again, the point I'm contesting is
you and your semantics. he was good for 43 games and he's another guy that gets a lot of WAR points for his defense. he's not really a starter at this point despite his defense.
He was a solid player for 3 years, though health was a concern.
He sucks this year, but the trade was obviously made before this year.
OK and getting WAR from defense is bad? Right around average for his position offensively and above average defensively means what? Again we're ignoring production this year because that's irrelevant to the trade.
Stop
His 3 years after his rookie season in wRC+ : 97 / 93 / 101 and this year he is at 85.
The fact that his BABIP is a 100 points higher this year and his numbers still suck is going to be hilarious when the BABIP corrects itself.
Again, for like the 100th time, this year is irrelevant to the trade.
And the average 3B wRC+ in 2012 was 100 in 2013 was 97 and in 2014 was 100. So he was below average 2 years and above average 1. And well above average defensively. In the AL those years it was 97, 98 and 100. So by that. Average, below average, above average. Again, slightly below average offensively, well above defensively. Good player.
The A's did not acquire Lawrie hoping he'd hit like he did in 2013. They were buying in for the upside that was still there (that may be gone now).