What's with the Hart on for pitchers this draft by our FO?
Just a hunch, but watch what happens around round 10. The Braves should have a boatload of draft money left to spend and might start taking some real chances.
Chances on who? Everett, Alonzo Jones, Luken Baker, Justin Hooper, etc? Matuella already got drafted...Who is still left out there that's intriguing?
Nosing around the internet a bit and checked out 10th round draft pick Stephen Moore from the Naval Academy. He's a native of Roswell, GA, and played his high school ball at The Walker School.
Found out another interesting tidbit. Former Braves' scouting director Chuck Lamar's kid--Charlie--also pitches for the Naval Academy.
Here's a look at what we've done in the middle rounds (4-10) over the years.
2006 We took 6 college pitchers. Medlen (10) was the only one to make the majors.
2007 We took 3 college pitchers. Gearrin was the only one to make the majors
2008 We took 5 college pitchers. Clemens, Oberholtzer and Hoover have reached the majors
2009 Just 1 college pitcher. No one from this group has made the majors yet. A couple have reached AAA.
2010 We took 3 college pitchers. Terdoslavich and Gosselin have made it from the group we took in the middle rounds.
2011 We took 3 college pitchers. Graham and Martin have made the majors, along with La Stella.
2012 We took 3 college pitchers. No one has made it yet. David Peterson (currently pitching in High A after TJ surgery) is the best of a poor group.
2013 We took 1 college pitcher, Steve Janas, and he appears to be the one from this group with the best chance of reaching the majors.
2014 We took 3 college pitchers--Sobotka, Diaz and Roney. Too early to say much about this group.
Over the entire 2006-2014 period, about half our picks in rounds 4-10 were college pitchers. But they accounted for seven out of the ten of the guys who reached the majors. I leave each of your to draw your own conclusions. Also note that on average only 1 player per year from the rounds 4-10 draftees makes the majors. If we get a yield of two or three from this years group, it should be counted a success.
Not a huge amount of Major League talent there... Medlen obviously the exception... doesn't seem like the best use of resources
Here's a look at what we've done in the middle rounds (4-10) over the years.
2006 We took 6 college pitchers. Medlen (10) was the only one to make the majors.
2007 We took 3 college pitchers. Gearrin was the only one to make the majors
2008 We took 5 college pitchers. Clemens, Oberholtzer and Hoover have reached the majors
2009 Just 1 college pitcher. No one from this group has made the majors yet. A couple have reached AAA.
2010 We took 3 college pitchers. Terdoslavich and Gosselin have made it from the group we took in the middle rounds.
2011 We took 3 college pitchers. Graham and Martin have made the majors, along with La Stella.
2012 We took 3 college pitchers. No one has made it yet. David Peterson (currently pitching in High A after TJ surgery) is the best of a poor group.
2013 We took 1 college pitcher, Steve Janas, and he appears to be the one from this group with the best chance of reaching the majors.
2014 We took 3 college pitchers--Sobotka, Diaz and Roney. Too early to say much about this group.
Over the entire 2006-2014 period, about half our picks in rounds 4-10 were college pitchers. But they accounted for seven out of the ten of the guys who reached the majors. I leave each of your to draw your own conclusions. Also note that on average only 1 player per year from the rounds 4-10 draftees makes the majors. If we get a yield of two or three from this years group, it should be counted a success.
One of the points to come out is that you only get one major league player per year on average from those rounds. Some perspective is needed. If we get two or three from this years group, it has to be counted a success.
This is great analysis on past draft trends . . . thanks. It seemed like today so many of the college guys projected as RPs according to the media folks. I wonder if the Braves see value in these sorts of players as converted starters.
That's not lost on me... but I'd rather take my chances on some positional talent because the return would likely be higher if we hit on one of them.
And I'm fine with taking pitchers... but I'm not fine with taking ONLY pitchers
Havent followed the draft but 11/13 pitchers is a bit stupid, sorry.
We dont have a ton of great hitting prospects, yes i know we develop pitching well but that seems too much.
IN before the i know more than the FO.