6/21/15: GDT - NY Mets @ Atlanta Braves

David O'Brien ‏@DOBrienAJC 28m28 minutes ago
Those who thought #Braves could lose 100: They'll need to go 27-65 rest of the way.
 
Several have already disagreed with you.

What fanbase doesn't say "we've blown some leads, if our bullpen was just better....."
 
Several have already disagreed with you.

What fanbase doesn't say "we've blown some leads, if our bullpen was just better....."

Braves have had hte worst bullpen in baseball this year. Its clear to anyone that doesn't feel like being a devils advocate in all instances that the Braves would have at the very least 2 more wins this year with just an average pen.
 
Braves have had hte worst bullpen in baseball this year. Its clear to anyone that doesn't feel like being a devils advocate in all instances that the Braves would have at the very least 2 more wins this year with just an average pen.

Well an average pen would still blow leads. Braves fans don't know what an average pen is because we have had probably the best pen in baseball since 2010.

But it's easily a 2 game difference like you said.
 
Well an average pen would still blow leads. Braves fans don't know what an average pen is because we have had probably the best pen in baseball since 2010.

But it's easily a 2 game difference like you said.

I really don't see how this can be debated other than the fact of someone who just hasn't watched the team at all this year.

Even just 2 games has the Braves 4 games over 500 tied with the Nationals. Personally, I think its closer to 4 games.
 
Braves have had hte worst bullpen in baseball this year. Its clear to anyone that doesn't feel like being a devils advocate in all instances that the Braves would have at the very least 2 more wins this year with just an average pen.

You are saying 2-4. 2 is probably the top end. (BBref has 1.7) The Braves haven't had the worst bullpen in the majors when you use win probability. The difference in the Braves pen and a really good one is 4 wins at this point.

You want to play strict results with the teams win/loss record then use hypotheticals with the bullpen. It doesn't make much sense. The team has been lucky win/loss wise despite a below average pen.

Right now, they are .500.
They would be 34-36 using pythag
They would be 31-39 using equivalent runs

You are essentially wanting to say the Braves should be a first place team if they were lucky and had a great bullpen.
 
I really don't see how this can be debated other than the fact of someone who just hasn't watched the team at all this year.

Even just 2 games has the Braves 4 games over 500 tied with the Nationals. Personally, I think its closer to 4 games.

The point is you have no basis for this. It's just making stuff up.
 
You are saying 2-4. 2 is probably the top end. (BBref has 1.7) The Braves haven't had the worst bullpen in the majors when you use win probability. The difference in the Braves pen and a really good one is 4 wins at this point.

You want to play strict results with the teams win/loss record then use hypotheticals with the bullpen. It doesn't make much sense. The team has been lucky win/loss wise despite a below average pen.

Right now, they are .500.
They would be 34-36 using pythag
They would be 31-39 using equivalent runs

You are essentially wanting to say the Braves should be a first place team if they were lucky and had a great bullpen.

Everything else would remain the same. All their other results. The only difference would be a pen that has blown a ridiculous amount of games this year so far.
 
Everything else would remain the same. All their other results. The only difference would be a pen that has blown a ridiculous amount of games this year so far.

How many games has the average pen blown so far?
 
If you trust fWAR's evaluation of relievers (I definitely hate WAR for relievers), then the Braves are -0.2 below replacement with an average pen right around 1.7. Two games is solid guesstimate.

I hate WAR for pitchers in general, and especially for relief pitchers. I find it to be a futile effort to approximate what our record would be. We have lost two games based on Fredi keeping Teheran in the 8th inning because he simply can't trust our bullpen. How do you measure strategy adjustments?
 
If you trust fWAR's evaluation of relievers (I definitely hate WAR for relievers), then the Braves are -0.2 below replacement with an average pen right around 1.7. Two games is solid guesstimate.

I hate WAR for pitchers in general, and especially for relief pitchers. I find it to be a futile effort to approximate what our record would be. We have lost two games based on Fredi keeping Teheran in the 8th inning because he simply can't trust our bullpen. How do you measure strategy adjustments?

win probability is 1.7 below average; which I think is the most accurate measure.
 
Back
Top