So, we can arrest Kim Davis now, right?

sturg33 said:
It's a pretty straight forward question. Would you support a gay business refusing service to this woman?

Why is that a BS question to ask? Because you don't like the answer?
Click to expand...

Is the gay baker the brother or sister of the purchaser?
Do the gay baker and the purchaser have a history of bullying ?
Is the gay baker local ?
Is the gay baker too busy to take on new customers ?
Does the gay baker hate straight people

on and on and on and on and on
 
50PoundHead said:
I think one should be careful when playing the states' rights card. The Supreme Court also overrode states' rights on issues of racial discrimination. When it comes to the failure to recognize the rights of some citizens, the 14th amendment is going to take precedence over states' rights. We can argue whether or not this should apply to the rights of homosexuals both inside and outside of the marriage issue, but this Supreme Court went the 14th amendment route.
Click to expand...

I think that's a fair point. But with no mention of marriage in the constitution, I don't see how you can reasonably conclude the supreme court had any authority on the matter
 
57Brave said:
Is the gay baker the brother or sister of the purchaser?
Do the gay baker and the purchaser have a history of bullying ?
Is the gay baker local ?
Is the gay baker too busy to take on new customers ?
Does the gay baker hate straight people

on and on and on and on and on
Click to expand...

LOL... so different rules then. Got it
 
sturg33 said:
There was when a gay couple wanted a cake from a Christian bakery, right?
Click to expand...

that was a specific instance. You asked an open ended "what if" question with out context

as noted above - you continually ask these kind of questions then troll people for not answering.
Frame better questions if you want an honest discussion
 
sturg33 said:
LOL... so different rules then. Got it
Click to expand...

not different rules, different scenarios.

Let me put it this way.

Should a batter always swing on a first pitch ?
An 0-2 count?

Should a manager call a hit and run every time there is a runner on first and a 2-1 count ?
Does a pitcher always throw a change up in the dirt with an 0-2 count.

Depends -- right?
 
57Brave said:
that was a specific instance. You asked an open ended "what if" question with out context

as noted above - you continually ask these kind of questions then troll people for not answering.
Frame better questions if you want an honest discussion
Click to expand...

I linked an example above with gay bakeries refusing service
 
I'm sure if I cared I could find a plethera of instances where gay bakers,hairdressers or auto mechanics did work for christians.

Again Sturg , it depends
 
57Brave said:
I'm sure if I cared I could find a plethera of instances where gay bakers,hairdressers or auto mechanics did work for christians.

Again Sturg , it depends
Click to expand...

Different rules for different folks. Don't run from your bigotry. Embrace it.

You've already embraced some horrifying things in the last couple weeks
 
Once again .
Different situations create different outcomes.

You ever pitch backwards back in the day ?
 
just so we're clear: there are people here who are cool with what she was doing? think it makes sense, is ok?
 
sturg33 said:
http://shoebat.com/2014/12/12/chris...age-cake-denied-service-watch-shocking-video/

There you go
Click to expand...

Will give this video a look later but this website should be good from just the second of looking at what the **** "shoebat.com" was:

07F1395D-182D-4689-9ABE-ECD00A882479_zps8fgrhmxg.png
 
Hawk said:
If people actually 'leave religion' because of other people then they gloriously missed the entire point -- which I guess speaks more to intellect than anything else.
Click to expand...

it turns people away, makes them sour on it, makes them question it more. as it should. it's pathetic.

being religious at all leads me to question someone's intellect, though.
 
The Republican Party ladies and gentleman:

Senator Ted Cruz of Texas said on Thursday that Ms. Davis jailing was an act of “judicial tyranny,” and in a statement he called on “every Believer, every Constitutionalist, every lover of liberty to stand with Kim Davis.”

Senator Rand Paul of Kentucky told CNN, “I think it’s absurd to put someone in jail for exercising their religious liberty.”

Former Gov. Mike Huckabee of Arkansas said on Twitter that he would go to Kentucky on Tuesday to support Ms. Davis. “We must end the criminalization of Christianity!” he wrote.
Click to expand...
 
sturg33 said:
It's a pretty straight forward question. Would you support a gay business refusing service to this woman?

Why is that a BS question to ask? Because you don't like the answer?
Click to expand...

this woman specifically? yeah, i would. because fluck her. she wants to pull this, be a martyr? she's a bigot. there are plenty of non-bigot christians and I've never heard of a salon turning down a person because they're a christian. when it happens, let's talk about it, mmk? until then, your hypotheticals are just that, and they're meaningless.
 
yeezus said:
this woman specifically? yeah, i would. because fluck her. she wants to pull this, be a martyr? she's a bigot. there are plenty of non-bigot christians and I've never heard of a salon turning down a person because they're a christian. when it happens, let's talk about it, mmk? until then, your hypotheticals are just that, and they're meaningless.
Click to expand...

Excellent. So you're a total hypocrite.

If they're unwilling to serve the entire public, then they have no right to be in business (as I was told many times)
 
LOL rand. this isn't her "religious liberty." you have a state job with great benefits making $80K. you, by law, must do it. if you don't want to, quit.

her lawyer compared her to a Jew in Nazi Germany. Just amazing **** these people think and say.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top