BedellBrave
It's OVER 5,000!
So they are martyrs (lower case 'm'), and what good is that? It's an unspeakable tragedy, same as the one before the one after. You seem eager to use that term; why are they different from other innocent deaths?
I think throwing that word around is unnecessary. How many people were killed this week because of who they were and what they believed? Do they get to be martyrs? How about those people in the hospital in Afghanistan?
Here are two words I wish we could put in the proverbial grave: martyr and prophet.
There's a good reason why we have that word - it indicates why the person was killed and what the person was willing to die for. Deleting the word from our vocabulary is a means to inoculate ourselves from the reality that some people are killed because others hate their faith. If you want to go down that road and flatten out all language - gut it of substance and helpful nuance - then drop the words "bigots, sexists, racists" and replace them with "haters."
This is a clear example of when to actually use the word.
I don't disagree with you though that it has been used in a bastardly way in too many other instances.