The only thing to stop a bad guy with a gun is a....

You absolutely assumed my position when you characterized me as someone who gets upset over bathroom politics, but gets upset when other politicize shootings. There wasn't another person in this thread that decried Goldy.
Like I said, I don't know if you do or don't have a stance on bathrooms,frankly I don't care.
My point was we (USA) feel comfortable politicizing having to go
but putting gun violence in a negative light is politicizing. Where politicizing is framed as if it were a bad thing
If you took it personal ...


To your other point, How does a waiting period prevent the tragedy that Goldy alluded to?
The concept of gun control waiting periods are pretty much the first step.
Have no idea if it would or wouldn't have prevented this. That wasn't the point,


There isn't even a political point made in this thread. At least with Sandy Hook you have grounds to be outraged.
The first poster after the initial post (you ? ) made a point of "why politicize"
I explained why I think gun violence in any form needs to be politicized and have been quite clear over the years who I find bears the lions share of responsibility

Who manufactured the weapons and took a profit ?
That is why it must be politicized.
Is the NRA a lemonade stand ?
 
Since when is Hillary taking your guns? Do you honestly think that is possible?

The process of reconditioning the populace to vote too ban the majority of legal gun sales has been in place for years now. They are indocrinating kids in schools to eventually vote away their rights. Thats what this "zero tolerance" bull**** is all about.
 
Since when is Hillary taking your guns? Do you honestly think that is possible?

IF Merrick is confirmed to the Court your guns will be taken away. Merrick is a gun confiscator. So I guess technically you're correct it would be Obama taking your guns away.
 
IF Merrick is confirmed to the Court your guns will be taken away. Merrick is a gun confiscator. So I guess technically you're correct it would be Obama taking your guns away.

Never gonna happen, the SCOTUS cannot change the Constitution, they only interpret it (poorly most of the time)
 
IF Merrick is confirmed to the Court your guns will be taken away. Merrick is a gun confiscator. So I guess technically you're correct it would be Obama taking your guns away.

Good luck taking them away from the felons and criminals that have them.

Chicago is in the top 5 most strictest places on Earth for guns and yet, shootings everyday. The police refuse to confiscate their guns on the risk of their lives. So the good people will get their guns confiscated and there will be no more hunting, so only the criminals will have them.

yay!!
 
Good luck taking them away from the felons and criminals that have them.

Chicago is in the top 5 most strictest places on Earth for guns and yet, shootings everyday. The police refuse to confiscate their guns on the risk of their lives. So the good people will get their guns confiscated and there will be no more hunting, so only the criminals will have them.

yay!!

Just more fear mongering, it'll never happen though I wish we could do a better job of vetting people who want to buy them. We need to stop the aholes from getting or keeping them and quit riling up law abiding people with this crap. You know there are still thousand of Texans who are convinced Obama's about to invade Texas, right?
 
IF Merrick is confirmed to the Court your guns will be taken away. Merrick is a gun confiscator. So I guess technically you're correct it would be Obama taking your guns away.

that's good quality Vol right there
 
The process of reconditioning the populace to vote too ban the majority of legal gun sales has been in place for years now. They are indocrinating kids in schools to eventually vote away their rights. Thats what this "zero tolerance" bull**** is all about.

I take it you don't believe in background checks. For the life of me, I cannot understand that position.
 
The funny thing to me about gun control nutjobs is the delusional idea that criminals won't be able to commit gun crimes if there are laws.... da fuq?

No armed robber or murderer/rapist ever said "you know, I'd like to go do some crimes, but it's illegal for me to purchase a handgun!"
 
The funny thing to me about gun control nutjobs is the delusional idea that criminals won't be able to commit gun crimes if there are laws.... da fuq?

No armed robber or murderer/rapist ever said "you know, I'd like to go do some crimes, but it's illegal for me to purchase a handgun!"

weird, i read this and it sounds like a **** ton of the same people who say the same thing and then are the same people who are in FAVOR of HB2 and other laws like it

so weird

i also am not exactly sure what you are advocating with your straw man though. do you believe in no laws at all?
 
weird, i read this and it sounds like a **** ton of the same people who say the same thing and then are the same people who are in FAVOR of HB2 and other laws like it

so weird

i also am not exactly sure what you are advocating with your straw man though. do you believe in no laws at all?

lol, it isn't a straw man, it is a firm truthful statement. just because it bweaks you widdle heart doesn't make it not true. Criminals do not care about laws, and violating a gun law so they can go commit violent crimes is not a deterrent.

you want gun control? then do it the proper way. Submit an amendment repealing the 2nd amendment, get it through congress and have it ratified by 3/4ths of the states. Anything else is unconstitutional and/or legislative activism. (and, funny enough, gun control doesn't make violent crime better, it tends to make it worse)
 
lol, it isn't a straw man, it is a firm truthful statement. just because it bweaks you widdle heart doesn't make it not true. Criminals do not care about laws, and violating a gun law so they can go commit violent crimes is not a deterrent.

you want gun control? then do it the proper way. Submit an amendment repealing the 2nd amendment, get it through congress and have it ratified by 3/4ths of the states. Anything else is unconstitutional and/or legislative activism. (and, funny enough, gun control doesn't make violent crime better, it tends to make it worse)

so, you are advocating for no laws at all?

do you support HB2 and other similar laws?

just would like to know where we stand on other things than the precious guns

it doesn't "bweaks my widdle heart" or whatever the **** that means

guns don't bother me. i own a gun but don't let any of that get in the way of whatever your attempted point is
 
No, I think keeping legal purchases out of the hands of mentally ill people is a good thing. What I am opposed to are bans, limits and restrictions placed upon the general public as if we have to be babysat by the nanny state. We have a 2nd amendment which allows us to own guns, IMO, any attempted law restricting that by any fed state or local legislation is a constitutional violation. If gun control advocates want to play, they should play by the rules and attempt to repeal the 2nd amendment. But they know that will never happen so they try and use judicial and legislative activism to circumvent the constitution and I find that tyrannical, deplorable and illegal.
 
We put limits on all the other ones without repealing any of the others

So weird to have a stance that is so extreme when it comes to one of them
But not the others

Using the word tyranny for any of the gun laws that are in this country.
HAHAHAHAHA.
 
Back
Top