2016 Election Coverage: Aka Every Way You Look at it You Lose.

Swap Trump for Rubio or Jeb or Kasich and is this a rout? Or did Trump drum up enthusiasm that those guys could never do?
 
Krgrecw said:
I think there's more to it than that. Working class whites are pissed about our current PC culture and big government.
Click to expand...

Nope.

They don't like Clinton. Crimson hit the nail on the head. Clinton isn't mobilizing voters as well as Obama did. She's losing big in many places Obama dominated.
 
Ho.. lee.. ****.. Nate Silver just tweeted that they are now calling Michigan as 50/50.
 
acesfull86 said:
Swap Trump for Rubio or Jeb or Kasich and is this a rout? Or did Trump drum up enthusiasm that those guys could never do?
Click to expand...

WRONG> They would have been eaten alive. You people still don't get it. It's a movement. And it's centered around Trump.
 
Nate Silver...

Guys, the odds you see on 538 right now are based only on CALLED STATES. Clinton's odds will crash when/if Florida is called against her.
 
I am partial to 538. Probably just because of Nate Silver's connection to baseball, but whatever, good or bad his is the source I trust.
 
weso1 said:
Ho.. lee.. ****.. Nate Silver just tweeted that they are now calling Michigan as 50/50.
Click to expand...

That was on the site awhile ago. the Shocker is that Pennsylvania and Wisconsin are put in the algorithm as too close to call. Trumps odds flipped massively on 538.
 
cajunrevenge said:
I am partial to 538. Probably just because of Nate Silver's connection to baseball, but whatever, good or bad his is the source I trust.
Click to expand...

Again, his odds are based on pre election predictions and called states. Trump is getting far more votes than anyone expected. He is a big favorite to win now.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top