The Trump Presidency

C_p9YCFXsAQo7uh.jpg:large
 
at the 6% mark of a Trump administration this :

He may need to bring in some new blood, too, as the Times reports that people seem downright traumatized since “few of Mr. Trump’s eruptions have had such a destructive effect on his administration or left such deep resentments among his scarred staff, according to Trump aides and surrogates.” Relatedly, one unnamed White House official switched roles when speaking with a CNN reporter, wanting to know, “Do you think we’re liars?”

http://nymag.com/daily/intelligence...staff-shakeup-at-demoralized-white-house.html
 
LOLGOP‏ @LOLGOP 5m5 minutes ago

LOLGOP Retweeted Chris Geidner

I love it when a birther thinks "I don't want to talk about it" is an acceptable answer.

no Trump enablers around here for a few days

Buyers remorse ?
snowflakes
 
the by line is Washington Post.
The story has been confirmed by NYT and others.
but not denied by Trump Campai ... ah Administration.

Administration is creating a false narrative and denying something that wasn't reported but not denying the story itself
...........

next question is does Speaker Ryan want to revoke Trump's security clearance as he has had a history of when national security appears to be leaked
edit:
and now Reuters confirms

worse part is Bartolo just had a 1-2-3 inning and Trump stole his thunder
 
57Brave said:
at the 6% mark of a Trump administration this :

He may need to bring in some new blood, too, as the Times reports that people seem downright traumatized since “few of Mr. Trump’s eruptions have had such a destructive effect on his administration or left such deep resentments among his scarred staff, according to Trump aides and surrogates.” Relatedly, one unnamed White House official switched roles when speaking with a CNN reporter, wanting to know, “Do you think we’re liars?”

http://nymag.com/daily/intelligence...staff-shakeup-at-demoralized-white-house.html
Click to expand...

Why anyone would want to work within the inner confines of the administration makes no sense to me.
 
Tell me what's more egregious: The President 'leaking' intelligence about a global terrorist threat to an American ally, or somebody with clearance high enough to be aware of said code-word intel leaking to the press?
 
Hawk said:
Tell me what's more egregious: The President 'leaking' intelligence about a global terrorist threat to an American ally, or somebody with clearance high enough to be aware of said code-word intel leaking to the press?
Click to expand...

Press = Good

Russians = Bad
 
Hawk said:
Tell me what's more egregious: The President 'leaking' intelligence about a global terrorist threat to an American ally, or somebody with clearance high enough to be aware of said code-word intel leaking to the press?
Click to expand...

Aren't they both examples of the same problem?
 
Kevin M. Kruse‏Verified account @KevinMKruse

BREAKING: Sen. McCain just raised his threat level to "furrowed brow," while Sen. Graham has gone from "concerned" to "very concerned."

until (D) can wrest control of Congress this carnival will go on. and on
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top