Julio3000
<B>A Chip Off the Old Rock</B>
Yes - American citizens. Doesn't matter where they are or what they look like I'm putting them ahead of illegals.
What's the net economic impact of DACA?
Yes - American citizens. Doesn't matter where they are or what they look like I'm putting them ahead of illegals.
i am fine helping them too
bringing this up reminds me of people who bring up some random job when people talk about raising minimum wage when it's fast food people.
"why do fast food workers deserve $15 if a hospital worker is only getting $15 an hour".
i am not against the hospital worker or whatever getting paid more too. they are most likely underpaid as well
thus it reminds me of your scenario, "well, what about these other people"
Well, they aren't being helped, they are being ****ed for doing the right thing. The legal thing. The admirable thing.
It isn't a fast food worker vs. a hospital worker scenario.
It's two fast food workers, both getting paid $15 an hour. Except, one worker spits on the burgers. And you have made the spitter a manager, because you think you have compassion.
And then, to add insult to injury, you are telling the other guy, the one who is just working hard and doing his job correctly, "Yo, just keep working harder bro! Something is coming for you!"
What's the net economic impact of DACA?
i am not saying they are or aren't being helped
i am saying, help them make it easier for them too
i was saying your scenario reminds me of the wage debate when someone says "what about these people over here" instead of staying on the topic
i am not saying they are or aren't being helped
i am saying, help them make it easier for them too
i was saying your scenario reminds me of the wage debate when someone says "what about these people over here" instead of staying on the topic
I'm not sure I get the spitting analogy.
My sympathies to the Dreamers, truly, but we can and should differentiate between their plight and a ****ty, illegal, vote-pandering executive order.
This country desperately needs immigration reform.
Shame that nobody trusts our Congress to get it done.
Who should receive priority on the gold-laden path to citizenship? Illegal aliens or legal aliens? Simple question.
Sure you do.
To break the law is to spit on it, no?
Who should receive priority on the gold-laden path to citizenship? Illegal aliens or legal aliens? Simple question.
Sure you do.
To break the law is to spit on it, no?
Might've been ****ty and vote-pandering, but its legality hasn't been fully judged.
And I blame a purposefully intractable Republican Congress for the EO as much as the former President; it reeks of something most mainstream Republicans were fine implementing, but—due to pressure from more extreme elements of their constituency—didn't want to be seen officially voting "for" it. (The half-assed healthcare overhaul under Obama falls in this category, as well.)
And you think that's a solid recap of the congressional opposition to reform?
i am totally on board helping illegal aliens who came here when they were 6 years old etc when their parents brought them here and know no other country except this one
the rest is political bull**** in my view
priority? this isn't a triage scenario where we have to pick and choose one or the other.
I get that you are hung up on 2013 and freedom caucus bitterness, but what about missed opportunities in 2006/2007? Who do you blame for that?
So why don't you want to help legal aliens who came here when they were 6?
Their emotional circumstances are exactly the same.
That's political bull****.
In this analogy you're comparing people who were illegally transported to the US as minors, were granted deferred status, and have to work, study, and keep their noses clean as condition of staying with someone who spits a hamburger.
So, yes, ****ty analogy.