Hollywood/Political Sex Offense Scandals (Now Louis CK and AL-GOPSenateNom Roy Moore)

goldfly said:
we are talking about the christian republican south

they don't care about this as long it is their guy. that "R" is all that matters

this guy should have been put in his place a long time ago with his stance and he's a known pedophile now and they will still vote for him
Click to expand...

Some, of course, will stick with him, but he was damaged goods even before this. They will find a way to send to the minors, or they won't. It's a win/win for Dems.
 
One accuser has removed anti-Moore facebook posts from her facebook page. Now why would someone do that?
 
thethe said:
[tw]929020177529761792[/tw]

Does this matter at all?
Click to expand...

If a history of false accusations were to be credibly reported, it would matter. "Posts on Moore's Facebook page" don't clear that bar.

I would say that you know better, but you demonstrate every day that you believe what you want to believe, regardless of anything.
 
I'm not even saying that he is innocent. I don't care about Moore more than a hole in the wall.

I just don't think that the whole world should just jump on with unsubstantiated allegations without some sort of real evidence. Weinstein I think its a bit different because apparently all of Hollywood knew about him. Have there ever been rumors about Moore in the past?
 
Julio3000 said:
If a history of false accusations were to be credibly reported, it would matter. "Posts on Moore's Facebook page" don't clear that bar.

I would say that you know better, but you demonstrate every day that you believe what you want to believe, regardless of anything.
Click to expand...

Why delete the posts at all? An action was taken whereby the accuser signed on to their facebook account and deleted posts. What prompted that? How does that not matter at all? It may mean absolutely nothing but that fact still should be understood.
 
thethe said:
I'm not even saying that he is innocent. I don't care about Moore more than a hole in the wall.

I just don't think that the whole world should just jump on with unsubstantiated allegations without some sort of real evidence. Weinstein I think its a bit different because apparently all of Hollywood knew about him. Have there ever been rumors about Moore in the past?
Click to expand...
HUH?

The only people who matter are Republican voters. He's only accused of dating minors while he was an Assistant District Attorney, and he's all but confirmed it.
 
Runnin said:
HUH?

The only people who matter are Republican voters. He's only accused of dating minors while he was an Assistant District Attorney, and he's all but confirmed it.
Click to expand...

Dating a 17/18 year old is much different than dating a 14 year old in my book. Each year at that age is a huge developmental year for both boys/girls. But again, those times were much different. If the allegations of the 14 year old are true though then that is beyond the pale. He deserves all the negative consequences in that case.
 
thethe said:
Dating a 17/18 year old is much different than dating a 14 year old in my book. Each year at that age is a huge developmental year for both boys/girls. But again, those times were much different. If the allegations of the 14 year old are true though then that is beyond the pale. He deserves all the negative consequences in that case.
Click to expand...

I think he's the perfect GOP candidate. He's a hypocritical scumbag who hides behind the Bible. Let him run. It's just more ugliness for the GOP brand to deal with.
 
thethe said:
Dating a 17/18 year old is much different than dating a 14 year old in my book. Each year at that age is a huge developmental year for both boys/girls. But again, those times were much different. If the allegations of the 14 year old are true though then that is beyond the pale. He deserves all the negative consequences in that case.
Click to expand...

The law is under 18. 14 last I checked was under 18. Even in Alabama.

Really blowing my head seemingly reasonable people excuse this.

Over political affiliation.

One poster wrote he would still vote for Moore because Moore would fight Roe v Wade.

Wondering if said poster understands the irony of that view ?

Roe v Wade has been the law since 1973 and stands a snowballs chance in hell of ever being repealed. You know why ?

So the rubes can kling to that ginormous maybe to continue to elect tax cutters and deregulators. And vote counter to their own interests. (R) has no intentof repealing their rallying point.

So yeah, vote for a child molester
 
57Brave said:
The law is under 18. 14 last I checked was under 18. Even in Alabama.

Really blowing my head seemingly reasonable people excuse this.

Over political affiliation.

One poster wrote he would still vote for Moore because Moore would fight Roe v Wade.

Wondering if said poster understands the irony of that view ?

Roe v Wade has been the law since 1973 and stands a snowballs chance in hell of ever being repealed. You know why ?

So the rubes can kling to that ginormous maybe to continue to elect tax cutters and deregulators. And vote counter to their own interests. (R) has no intentof repealing their rallying point.

So yeah, vote for a child molester
Click to expand...

Not according to this...

https://www.legalmatch.com/law-library/article/alabama-age-of-consent-lawyers.html
 
I stand corrected. A 30 something officer of the court,future Supreme Court chief Justice and future candidate for US Senator is cought in Secual Abuse rather than Statutory Rape.

Quite the legal hair to split
 
57Brave said:
I stand corrected. A 30 something officer of the court,future Supreme Court chief Justice and future candidate for US Senator is cought in Secual Abuse rather than Statutory Rape.

Quite the legal hair to split
Click to expand...

****. you Have no problem supporting an ex president whose done a lot worse than one sexual abuse scandal.
 
57Brave said:
The law is under 18. 14 last I checked was under 18. Even in Alabama.

Really blowing my head seemingly reasonable people excuse this.

Over political affiliation.

One poster wrote he would still vote for Moore because Moore would fight Roe v Wade.

Wondering if said poster understands the irony of that view ?

Roe v Wade has been the law since 1973 and stands a snowballs chance in hell of ever being repealed. You know why ?

So the rubes can kling to that ginormous maybe to continue to elect tax cutters and deregulators. And vote counter to their own interests. (R) has no intentof repealing their rallying point.

So yeah, vote for a child molester
Click to expand...

You never answered my question about whether you would vote for Bill Clinton over Rand Paul
 
57Brave said:
The law is under 18. 14 last I checked was under 18. Even in Alabama.

Really blowing my head seemingly reasonable people excuse this.

Over political affiliation.

One poster wrote he would still vote for Moore because Moore would fight Roe v Wade.

Wondering if said poster understands the irony of that view ?

Roe v Wade has been the law since 1973 and stands a snowballs chance in hell of ever being repealed. You know why ?

So the rubes can kling to that ginormous maybe to continue to elect tax cutters and deregulators. And vote counter to their own interests. (R) has no intentof repealing their rallying point.

So yeah, vote for a child molester
Click to expand...

Nope.

I never said I would still vote for Moore.

I specifically said I don't know enough about Moore to say if I would vote for him, and that I would not vote for Jones because I won't vote for pro Roe v Wade candidates.
 
can't go for pro roe v wade people

how else will the people you support be able to molest 14 year olds if the fetus doesn't go to term?
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top