Russia Collusion Scandal (aka A Leftist fantasy)

Back in the world where charges have been filed, indictments brought, and pleas entered...looks like Rick Gates is going to cut a deal. I guess his very smart and expensive lawyers don't think it's wise to wait for the Deep State conspiracy to unravel.
 
[tw]956008110270877696[/tw]

Nice little summary here mainly focused on the HRC investigation. Lack of acknowledgement of fhese gtoss abuses from the FBI proves you can't look at this objectively.

And if they went through these lengths to exonerate HRC then we all know what's coming with these FISA warrants.

The question is will the left be able to move on? What is the country going to look like when the Mueller probe is finished and members of the last administration are indicted?
 
Julio3000 said:
Ok. Change the channel and you can't throw a rock without hitting a former US Attorney who is saying something diametrically opposed. Either way it's not really the "former" types that matter.
Click to expand...

Not that message. Th one where I replied to crimes committed by Mills and abedin.
 
http://www.washingtonexaminer.com/t...bamanomics/article/2646900?platform=hootsuite

Posted this in another thread but it also deserves visibility here. Particularly this little nugget:

Two months later, Obama announced a concession to Russia: He would scrap U.S. plans to build a missile shield in Eastern Europe. Reuters reported, "Shortly after the pullback on the shield programme was announced, Russia's government said Prime Minister Vladimir Putin would meet several U.S. executives on Friday from firms including General Electric.”
 
Julio3000 said:
Back in the world where charges have been filed, indictments brought, and pleas entered...looks like Rick Gates is going to cut a deal. I guess his very smart and expensive lawyers don't think it's wise to wait for the Deep State conspiracy to unravel.
Click to expand...

I thought this was where Gates was headed all along. Ditto for Manafort, who I believe does have information of relevance on targets higher up the food chain.
 
Runnin said:
I didn't first, but grew to have a deep respect for him and the way he went did his job.
Click to expand...

I didn't vote for him in 2008 because my Berkeley (that's where I was living at the time) friends were suspiciously excited about him. But once in office I found that while he was to the left of me politically he was nothing like what those Berkeley friends were expecting. They were quite disappointed as a matter of fact.
 
I respect that you guys are still willing to hold up the fight after a tsunami of evidence about to hit the scenes of malfeasance from the Obama administration/FBI. Kudos
 
57Brave said:
Is malfeasance now an indictable crime ?

That seems one of those not sure - not yet questions
Click to expand...

You should do some research on the proof that has come out. And then I'd advise you to read the memo and subsequent declassifications of the FISA court absues. Maybe you believe it maybe you don't because of your obvious bias but the truth that is out there is definitely going to lead to indictments and jail time.
 
thethe said:
[tw]956008110270877696[/tw]

Nice little summary here mainly focused on the HRC investigation. Lack of acknowledgement of fhese gtoss abuses from the FBI proves you can't look at this objectively.

And if they went through these lengths to exonerate HRC then we all know what's coming with these FISA warrants.

The question is will the left be able to move on? What is the country going to look like when the Mueller probe is finished and members of the last administration are indicted?
Click to expand...

I see a lot of hand-waving and some stuff that sounds nefarious if you're willing to swallow a couple of major assumptions...one of which is the spooky interpretation of the "insurance policy" text, acceptance of which means you've already made up your mind. I mean, you can keep posting this stuff, but it's useless without some underpinning facts.

I'll ask you again: if Strzok was an anti-Trump supervillain who was leading a conspiracy against him, why was he all like "ugh, do I have to?" about joining the Office of the Special Counsel? And what to make of the fact that he was bumped from the team in July, when the information came to light?
 
thethe said:
You should do some research on the proof that has come out. And then I'd advise you to read the memo and subsequent declassifications of the FISA court absues. Maybe you believe it maybe you don't because of your obvious bias but the truth that is out there is definitely going to lead to indictments and jail time.
Click to expand...

Whoa, slow down. What proof? What memo? Who's going to jail?
 
I see enough here to warrant a second special counsel.

What’s there to hurt by letting an investigation bear out?

*smirk*
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top