Russia Collusion Scandal (aka A Leftist fantasy)

I can't get over that the next chapter in "This is Big!" ended as quickly as it did.

Should we guess how many more times the collusion crowd is going to fall for it again?
 
thethe said:
I can't get over that the next chapter in "This is Big!" ended as quickly as it did.

Should we guess how many more times the collusion crowd is going to fall for it again?
Click to expand...

They wake up every morning checking all of their leftist sources and jump on every lead that's "reported"

Having that daily disappoint makes me feel sorry for them
 
thethe said:
So what this is basically admitting is that after 1.5 years (including the FBI doing their shady dealings) there is no evidence of collusion.

Don't you find that a bit odd?
Click to expand...

Recently I referred to the the timelines of other special counsel investigations, in response to sturg. I think that speaks for itself.


As for what evidence exists or doesn't exist, I don't pretend to know, but I think it's foolish to think that what's known is in the public domain at this point. You've taken the temporal and public absence of evidence as evidence of absence (to paraphrase Donald Rumsfeld) and I think that's a mistake.
 
Julio3000 said:
Recently I referred to the the timelines of other special counsel investigations, in response to sturg. I think that speaks for itself.


As for what evidence exists or doesn't exist, I don't pretend to know, but I think it's foolish to think that what's known is in the public domain at this point. You've taken the temporal and public absence of evidence as evidence of absence (to paraphrase Donald Rumsfeld) and I think that's a mistake.
Click to expand...

Very well may be a mistake but the shift in the narrative completely away from collusion outside of the far left outlets should be telling.

Again - The big stories recently are about how a channel to Russia was being created months AFTER the election. Come on Julio...this is not some crazy theory that no collusion existed. And no, saying "I hope Russia finds e-mails" is not collusion.
 
thethe said:
Very well may be a mistake but the shift in the narrative completely away from collusion outside of the far left outlets should be telling.

Again - The big stories recently are about how a channel to Russia was being created months AFTER the election. Come on Julio...this is not some crazy theory that no collusion existed. And no, saying "I hope Russia finds e-mails" is not collusion.
Click to expand...

Honestly no idea what you're talking about. The subject isn't credibly put to bed until the investigation is complete and its findings made public. Extrapolation based on what's currently public seems a fools errand, as I've acknowledged even while partaking.
 
At the end of the day, thethe, you've maintained that Seth Rich leaked the DNC emails and was murdered by Hillary Clinton, so I'm not even sure why I should continue to engage with you like you are a rational person.
 
Hawk said:
Also, who eats lunch at Barneys?

Whatever.

New York is weird place.
Click to expand...

What did they eat? Tweed jackets? But yeah, Manhattan is weird. It's like the embodiment of the cartoon with the wolf and the sheepdog chase each other around all day and then have cocktails together.
 
Julio3000 said:
At the end of the day, thethe, you've maintained that Seth Rich leaked the DNC emails and was murdered by Hillary Clinton, so I'm not even sure why I should continue to engage with you like you are a rational person.
Click to expand...

That is not a closed case because well nobody decided to fully investigate the hack.

Rationality? How about jumping through a hoop every single time someone leaks a report on collusion?

Was I irrational when I stated the FBI used the dossier to get a FISA warrant? How many times can you call me irrational?
 
Last edited:
I'd love an explanation of why Donna Brazille wrote in her book in regards to Rich as well as being fearful for her life?
 
thethe said:
That is not a closed case because well nobody decided to fully investigate the hack.

Rationality? How about jumping through a hoop every single time someone leaks a report on collusion?

Was I irrational when I stated the FBI used the dossier to get a FISA warrant? How many times can you call me irrational?
Click to expand...

I think you continue to struggle with the idea of what's currently in the public domain versus what can be reasonably assumed to be known. I have very little doubt that the DNC hack will be attributed, quite possibly on a granular level. My hypothesis on who perpetrated it is probably a lot closer to the mark than yours.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top