You keep talking about eyewitness testimony, but the only two actual eyewitnesses to the Ford incident are, again, the accused himself and Mark Judge, who’s written extensively about his blackout drinking and is a problematic witness, to say the least.
You’re saying you’re only on the side of due process, yet you don’t think Judge not being subpoenaed is a red flag?
I’m still curious as to why you think the Ramirez accusation, even if true, is not disqualifying, and how that logic applies to the Ford situation. This thread is getting long, so if you answered it upthread, my apologies.