Freshmaker
Arbitration Eligible
Still superior to watching Markakis pull a grounder to second over a hundred times a season.
that seems to be a requirement with every RF we put out there
Still superior to watching Markakis pull a grounder to second over a hundred times a season.
Gallo has big, obvious flaws, but we're at the point where our outfield options are either guys with big, obvious flaws or a couple players who would be hideously expensive to acquire. Haniger is basically a perfect fit, but you don't get him without giving Dipoto his pound of flesh. Joc Pederson fits well, but he's unplayable against lefties, and LA knows how to extract value.
So then you start going through guys like Gallo, Puig (assuming the Reds would be interested in flipping him), Kepler, Frazier, moving Camargo to left, bringing back Markakis, etc. They all have serious weaknesses. At that point it basically becomes a matter of value, which we can only really evaluate when a deal is made.
The choice is either suck it up and pay the ransom for Haniger, hoping he's this year's Yelich, or pick someone with glaring holes in his game.
Kinda funny how you put Gallo in the tier below Pederson, but he's been clearly a better player.
Gallo is one a the few 80 power guys I remember seeing. With his control left (and if the package to nab him would be right), he would be a great guy to get. Give him a change of scenery under a different hitting coach. He probably is what he is, but with that kind of power, it would be a good gamble. If he could “find” something...you basically have Stanton on the cheap.
Look at Gallos home vs away splits.
6 less home runs on the road
.186 avg on the road vs .227 avg at home
.285 OBP on the road
.716 OPS on the road vs .906 at home
I see Dan Uggla 2.0 with a few more homeruns and a little better defense....
It's called a small sample size. 4 months out of 4 years is a small sample.
The away from home stuff was shot down pretty good if you go back and read the post that Beanie put together
Rather than take a full year sample that went against your feelings you broke it down into two pieces and chose the smaller piece as self vindication.
With Haniger, Peralta, Gallo, Pollock, and a few others as legit OF options there is no reason why AA can’t fill that spot with a 3 win guy.
The point is that that’s the only four-month stretch out of the entire past four years that looks at all like that. If anyone’s self-vindicating it’s The Straw Grasper.
Rather than take a full year sample that went against your feelings you broke it down into two pieces and chose the smaller piece as self vindication.
All I’ve ever said about Markakis is That he doesn’t bother me as a fall back at the right price and his prospects of being productive in the first half of the season aren’t as dim as others have made it out to be.
Other than acquisition cost?
No reason he "can't", plenty of reasons to wonder if any or all make sense when the bill comes due (as MF II mentions above).
All I’ve ever said about Markakis is That he doesn’t bother me as a fall back at the right price and his prospects of being productive in the first half of the season aren’t as dim as others have made it out to be.
Rather than take a full year sample that went against your feelings you broke it down into two pieces and chose the smaller piece as self vindication.
He basically said he didn’t believe in the part of the numbers that looked bad.
Sometimes when I read clv posts like this, I like to imagine that he's actually Zack De La Rocha at PinkPop '93 and he's just fighting the man. The statistical man.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8de2W3rtZsA